Skip to main content

Jesus is Nobody's Hermes Mr JW

Image
By
Hermes

Jesus is no-one’s Hermes, a strange title, but stick with me and we’ll see what we can make of it. Hermes was the Greek god of translators and interpreters. More clever than all the other gods, he was the messenger of the gods. The Roman equivalent is, of course, Mercury.

God’s have messengers, other gods who run errands for them. Oberon, king of the faeries in Shakespeare’s Midsummer Night’s Dream, sent the mischievous Puck on an errand to find a special plant with magical qualities.

More prosaically, human kings have messengers, such as the character Herald, in Shakespeare’s Henry V, who passes through the battlefield unscathed because of his role carrying messages between the French king and England’s Henry.


God’s Messengers


The God of the Bible has messengers, human prophets and apostles, but also angels. ‘Angel’ comes from the Latin angelus; Greek aggelos; from the Hebrew for "one going" or "one sent," a messenger. These messengers from the throne-room of God play major roles at key moments in the unfolding of God’s plan and are incredible beings.

Daniel’s prayer was heard as he uttered it and an angel was sent with a message from God (Daniel 10). Zechariah, serving as a priest in the temple, saw an angel who foretold the birth of a son, announcing the preparation of a people for the Lord Jesus:

‘The angel said to [Zechariah]...your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you shall call his name John...And he will turn many of the children of Israel to the Lord their God...to make ready for the Lord a people prepared.’ (Lk.1:13-17)

When Zechariah expressed doubt an indignant messenger said, ‘I am Gabriel, I stand in the presence of God, and I was sent to speak to you and bring you this good news. And behold you will be silent and unable to speak until the day that these things take place, because you did not believe my words…’

You don’t take angels for granted. That same Gabriel appeared to Mary to announce the Nativity:

‘The angel said to [Mary], ‘Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favour with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High.’ (Lk.1:30-32)

An angel appeared to her betrothed, Joseph:

‘...an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream, saying, Joseph, son of David, do not fear to take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. She will bear a son and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from their sin.’ (Mt.1:20-21)

and a host of angels appeared to shepherds to announce ‘good news of great joy.’

‘And the angel said to them, ‘Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord.’ (Lk.2:10-11)

An angel appears twice at the empty tomb:

‘Now after the Sabbath, toward the dawn of the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to see the tomb. And behold there was a great earthquake, for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven and came and rolled back the stone and sat on it...the angel said to the women, ‘Do not be afraid, for I know you seek Jesus who was crucified. He is not here, for he has risen...’ (Mt. 28:1-6)

The book of Revelation begins with the visit of an angel to John on the island of Patmos to bear witness, ‘to the word of God and to the testimony of Jesus Christ…’ (Rev.1:1-3)


More Than a Messenger


Is this Jesus an archangel, as Jehovah’s Witnesses insist? Is the one for whom such preparations were made, such announcements proclaimed, such testimony borne, merely a messenger himself? The picture painted in Scripture says not. Indeed, the book of Hebrews settles the issue for anyone with eyes to see:

‘For to which of the angels did God ever say, ‘You are my Son, today I have begotten you’?

‘Or again, ‘I will be to him a father, and he shall be my son’?

And again, when he brings the firstborn into the world, he says, ‘Let all God’s angels worship him.’

But of the Son he says, ‘Your throne, O God, is forever, the sceptre of uprightness is the sceptre of your kingdom.’’ (Hebrews 1:5-8)

Jesus is nobody’s Hermes, no messenger of God, but God the Son himself become human.

He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the majesty on high, having become as much superior to angels as the name he inherited is more excellent then theirs.’ (Hebrews 1:3-4)

‘Therefore God highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.’ (Philip.2:9-10)

Do angels move and work among us today? The writer of Hebrews believes so, urging us, ‘Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.’ (Hebrews 13:2)

If it happens to you, learn from Zechariah and don’t question an angel’s integrity and authority. But, no matter how magnificent the angel, if it is an angel you can be sure it’s a messenger and not the message.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

By
In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

By
The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...
70 comments
Read more

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

By
The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...
18 comments
Read more