Skip to main content

The Morals of a Cretan

Paul's letter to Titus in the New Testament contains a remarkable and disturbing observation. Paul writes:

'One of the Cretans, a prophet of their own, said, "Cretans are always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons." This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in faith…' (1:12/13)

Titus was a Greek convert to Christianity, Paul referring to him as, 'my true child in the faith.' (1:4) He had a challenging assignment, so Paul wrote words both of encouragement and of instruction, 'as for you, teach what accords with sound doctrine.' (2:1) This is a theme throughout this letter, indeed, in his whole ministry.

The fact Titus was to appoint elders in every town tells us this was a new church plant. The above quote gives some insight into what Titus had to draw on to accomplish his task. It is a shocking thing to read, xenophobic one might think. Paul, of course, was making a generalisation, not implying every citizen of Crete was 'a liar, evil beast, lazy glutton.' Cretans were known throughout the ancient world, however, for moral decadence.

Polybius, the ancient historian, wrote it was, 'almost impossible to find...personal conduct more treacherous or public policy more unjust than in Crete.' (Histories 6.47)

Cicero said, 'Moral principles are so divergent that the Cretans...consider highway robbery honourable.' (Republic 3.9.15)

Paul, throughout this letter, is contrasting and comparing the standards of the kingdom with the way the Cretans lived.

Elders appointed should be 'above reproach.' (1:6)

There should be no debauchery or insubordination in his family. (1:6)

Arrogance, drunkenness, a quick temper, violence, and greed disqualified a candidate. (1:7)

Older men are to be sober-minded, dignified, self-controlled, sound in faith, in love, and in steadfastness. (2:2)

Older women are to be reverent in behaviour, not slanderers or slaves to much wine. (2:3)

And so the instruction continues, to young men, slaves, and all in their role as citizens, in submitting to authorities. Paul is describing upright citizenship in God's kingdom to the leader in a community that values the very opposite. I am sure we can go some way in identifying with Titus' challenge.

Doctrine

This is a call to godliness, and Paul begins his letter with the sound basis for our godliness:

'Paul, a servant of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ, for the sake of the faith of God's elect and their knowledge of the truth, which accords with godliness…' (1:1)

The faith of God's elect is built on a knowledge of the truth, and this truth and the faith it engenders is what accords with godliness. Why should I be godly? Because you have the truth, a truth that gives you good reason to believe. Your faith, built on the truth, brings you to Christ who, alone, saves.

He draws this out again, later in this letter. Having contrasted the righteous saved with the conduct of the worldly Cretans, He writes:

[All this] 'For the grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation for all people, training us to renounce ungodliness and worldly passions, and to live self-controlled, upright, and godly lives in the present age.…' (2:11/12)

This is not simply a head knowledge, a philosophy the Cretans have decided to embrace. God's grace has appeared in Christ, his power demonstrated in the life-changing new birth experience of true believers. But culture clings to us like a bad smell and we must set high standards so, in God's strength, we carry less each day the aroma of this world, and more the aroma of the world to come.

Underpinning all this is sound doctrine. Just as Paul contrasts kingdom conduct with Cretan corruption, so he challenges empty and harmful doctrine with simple gospel truth.

He writes of 'those of the circumcision party' who insisted people come to Christ through the Law of Moses, a gospel of works. (1:10) Too many, far too many Christians today subscribe to a gospel of works, despite Paul's words, 'he saved us, not because of works done by us in righteousness, but according to his own mercy…' (Titus 3:5)

He writes of those who teach 'for shameful gain what they ought not to teach.' (1:11) There is an awful lot of that about today. We see it, and sadly so does the world. 'Ministries' bringing empty promises, issuing solemn diktats, and swallowing up resources that could be supporting vital local churches like the one led by Titus.

He counsels the avoidance of 'foolish controversies, genealogies, dissensions, and quarrels about the law, [and] division.' (3:9-11) The Internet is awash with people who major on minor issues, we see it in the cults, and sometimes in the church.

In all we believe, in all we do, insists Paul, we are to show good faith, 'so that in everything [we] may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour.' (2:10)

'As for you, teach what accords with sound doctrine.' (2:1) 'Declare these things; exhort and rebuke with authority. Let no one disregard you.' (2:15)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...