Skip to main content

National Empowerment Summit

"I belong to the top" (Matt. 5:14).

This is the Bible quotation that greets you under the section 'Prophetic Focus for September 2009' on Bishop David Oyedepo's website.

You may be thinking - I don't remember that part of the Sermon on the Mount?
You may be thinking - I do remember the bit where Jesus in fact says, "Blessed are the meek."

The reason why you don't remember that quotation is because it isn't there. Matthew 5:14 actually reads: "You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden."

So Bishop David and his Winners' Fellowship may want to gloss the Lord's words as "I belong to the top", but is it really fair to post it as a direct quotation? In fact, is it in any way a fair interpretation of the text? What is the Lord Jesus actually saying here?

Jesus says, "You," but Bishop David says, "I." The Lord is giving a statement to a collective 'you' which will soon be followed by a command ("let your light shine before men..."). Bishop David turns this into a individualistic, egocentric, positive-confession mantra - "I belong to the top... I belong to the top... I belong to the top."

Secondly, Jesus says, "You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden." The image before this is 'the salt of the earth'. So - salt, light, city. These are all centrifugal, outward-looking metaphors. God incarnate is calling His followers to season this rotten world with His saltiness; to illuminate this dark world with His light; to be a distinct and visible gathering of people who represent Him, like a city on a hill. But Bishop David has turned this 'go and be a distinctive blessing to this world' injunction into a 'get yourself to the top because that's your destiny' ear-tickler.

But then we knew that would happen, didn't we?

"For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear" (2 Timothy 4:3).

I checked out the website because I was given a flyer for the 'National Empowerment Summit' (no weasel words here) in July this year at London's Excel centre, with a lovely picture of Bishop David looking sleek and successful on the front.

What did I notice about this invite?

No Jesus.

Absolutely Christless. Of the c.200 words on the back, none of the make the slightest reference to the centre of all our faith and hope. So what are the words about?

Bishop David and his power to heal people:

"I started to pray," reads Danjuma N.'s testimony, "and the Spirit told me this is not a matter for discussion, the only person you can discuss this with is the Bishop, because cancer is afraid of him. He prayed and rebuked Satan, and spoke life into me. He gave me a mantle and said, "take it and go"... I was given a clean bill of health" (my bold, all other punctuation as in original).

It is clear that Bishop David is a trinitarian of sorts - The Father, the Spirit and Bishop David. Together, they rebuke Satan and cancer, which is especially afraid of Bishop David. This, of course, leaves no room for the Lord Jesus Christ.

Plead, beg, exhort, challenge, encourage, warn, rebuke, study with any friends of yours who are bound up with this man-glorifying poison. Bring them back to the simplicity and beauty of Christ and Him crucified. He is all the living water we'll ever need.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Cheers!

  In their latest update #4, the Jehovah’s Witnesses' Governing Body has announced that toasting and ‘ clinking glasses’  is now allowed at the individual Jehovah’s Witness’s ‘ bible trained conscience’ .  This, Governing Body member Stephen Lett tells us, is due to ‘ prayerful consideration’  by the Governing Body.  This doesn’t sound unreasonable; who could possibly object to toasting, it’s such an innocuous custom?  The answer to that is the Governing Body itself, until now. Ever since 1952, and possibly earlier, the Watchtower has roundly condemned this practice due to its ‘ pagan roots’  in ‘ false religion’ .  The 15 May 1952 Watchtower (page 319), has this to say on the matter Jehovah God and Christ Jesus are not honored by having pagan customs of toasting switched to them, or to human s In 1968, in an answer to  Questions from Readers,  the 1 Jan Watchtower states If a Christian is going to make a request f...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...