Skip to main content

The Richmond Briefing

A weekly Bible reading for Bridge Builders

The Richmond Briefing has been a weekly feature of the Reachout web site for five years and is now available on the blog. To find out more and read earlier briefings go here

Reading – A Suffering Saviour, and a Called Out People (Matthew 16:13-28)

This is a key passage in helping us understand the purposes of God in Christ and in his disciples. Until now Jesus has preached the message of the kingdom, demonstrating its presence by his teaching, healing and casting out of demons (Luke.11:20). Now he had established his identity among his closest followers he began to emphasise the Cross as the way he must go in order to establish this kingdom (Mt.16:21).

Peter’s confession marked a turning point after which Jesus more clearly taught about the principles on which the kingdom was to be established and the role of the called out people of God in advancing it. There has been much controversy over what was meant when Jesus spoke of the foundation of the church. Was it Peter; nicknamed “the Rock”, as claimed by Roman tradition? Was it the revelation alluded to when Jesus said, “This was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven”, as claimed by the Mormons? Was it the act of confession that is the starting point of every Christian life, as suggested by others? Paul wrote to the Corinthians:

“By the grace God has given me, I laid a foundation, as an expert builder, and someone else is building on it. But each one should be careful how he builds. For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ” (1 Co.3:10-11)

Christ himself, then, is the rock on which the church is built and any other, as Paul wrote, would be destroyed by the fire of judgement when every man’s work will be tested (1 Co.3:12-13).

Jesus goes on to give the keys of the kingdom of heaven and the power to “bind and loose”. Again there is speculation about what these keys are and who legitimately commands that power. Is it given to one man to issue forgiveness or judge the sinner? This idea came late in church history and has more to do with the rise of political power in Rome than the wielding of heavenly authority. If we think of it as authority to announce and declare rather than one to determine guilt or innocence we may see the first Christians (about 120 of them Acts 1:15) exercising that authority at Pentecost where they declared the good news of the kingdom. As the Body of Christ Christians exercise such authority today in declaring the good news and the closer we walk with Christ who is our Head the more authentic our claim to be speaking him.

When Jesus declared “on this rock I will build my church” the word translated “church” is ekklÄ“sia. An ekklÄ“sia is an assembly or congregation and in the ancient world it identified an assembly of free voting citizens in a city. The church then is the gathering of the called out people of God who are marked out by their rights as citizens in God’s kingdom. It is not a building, or an institution with hierarchies of authority but the people of God expressing the kingdom of God in the world. This expression of God’s kingdom involves being Jesus to other people, expressing our faith in the way we live every day and so continuing to declare the good news in word and deed.

There is also a process of sanctification in which the Christian becomes more like Jesus who said:

“If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will find it” (Mt.16:24-25)

Christians are called to go on with God and some people struggle with the faith when they see the gap between what we are today and what God has called us to be. But our lives are a journey and it has been wisely observed that we are pilgrims and not settlers in this world. In that journey of faith we are to lose our lives. This does not mean martyrdom, although many continue to die for their faith in Christ. Neither does it mean losing our identity but it means losing our old self with its sinful way of life in our striving to find our new selves in Christ. Jesus said, “What good will it be if a man gains the whole world, yet forfeits his soul (or self)”. It is this last, Christ like self that we lose if we set our hearts on the things of this world.

To gain the kingdom involves denying our worldly selves. This does not mean a life of misery on iron rations. Paul helps us see what is meant here when he writes to Timothy:

“Command those who are rich in this present world not to be arrogant nor to put their hope in wealth, which is so uncertain, but to put their hope in God, who richly provides us with everything for our enjoyment” (1 Tim.6:17)

Self-denial is not the same as refusing any of the good things given by God for our enjoyment but the refusal to put our trust in these things. To trust in the things of the world leads to living by the standards of the world, indulging in greed, envy, arrogance, bitterness, self-pity and pride, none of which are the fruit of the Spirit of God (Gal.5:16-26).

Christians are a people who take up their cross daily by denying themselves and choosing God’s way, declaring salvation for all who believe and keeping close to Jesus as we strive to model our ways on him. We mustn’t allow the world to judge us and neither must we judge ourselves so harshly as to make ourselves lose heart. But we must judge wisely as we make our way in this world, always willing to lay down those things that hinder us and daily taking up our cross to follow him and win others to him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...