Skip to main content

The 'Little Flock' of the Watch Tower


A familiar Watch Tower teaching is that there are two groups of people after judgement, one in heaven and one on earth (a third if you count the ones that don’t make it). A good question we should always be prepared to ask is, ’Where does the Bible say that?’ Of course, they usually have an answer. They say on their website:

‘Those “who are called and chosen” to rule with Christ in the Kingdom are referred to as a “little flock.” (Revelation 17:14; Luke 12:32) This shows that they would be relatively few in comparison with the complete number of Jesus’ sheep.​—John 10:16.’

This is where you ask the second question. Who in the Bible makes those links? Who in the Bible talks like you? As far as they’re concerned it jumps off the page, but it really doesn’t. They believe they alone have the explanation, often thinking we are puzzled by such questions. None of this is true.

In Luke 12 Jesus, addressing his disciples, tells them they are to acknowledge him before men (8-12). They are going to stand out because they are not to be like the establishment (1). They are not to have the same priorities as the world around them (13-21). So Jesus counsels them ‘Have no fear’ (4); ‘Do not be anxious’ (22). Why?

Because the world is big, the task is great, and their little community is small, a little flock. The task would seem impossible. Jesus understood that, so he reassures them, ‘Fear not little flock, for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom.’ (32) It is not in their power to take the kingdom, it is God’s ‘good pleasure’ to give them the kingdom. The fact of being little has no bearing on God’s determined purpose.

This has nothing to do with the 144,000 in Revelation 7. Nobody in Scripture makes that connection, it isn’t a Bible teaching. Further, the only way they can make those that are with Christ in Revelation 17:14 the 144,000 is if they make a connection between Luke 12:32 and Revelation7, a connection none of the Bible writer’s make. It is an apologetic with no visible means of support. Nobody in Scripture talks like a Jehovah’s Witness.

Their appeal to John 10:16 is really unhelpful to them. Here Jesus speaks of ‘other sheep’ he must bring, but he doesn’t mean a different flock. He means the Gentiles, as prophesied in Isaiah 56:3,6,8, other sheep that will be brought in and included. Far from there being two flocks, a little and a greater, Jesus makes clear that, when all are gathered in, ’there will be one flock and one shepherd.’ Their teaching contradicts the clear words of Jesus, and they cannot show anyone in the New Testament talking like a Jehovah’s Witness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Mormon God’s Dysfunctional Family

You know those moments when you look at something you’ve looked at a thousand times before and suddenly see something new? I was looking at a blog I found via the Google Blog Alerts service and it told the familiar story of the Mormon “ Plan of Salvation”; you can read it here. There really was nothing surprising until I started thinking about what people might think if a family they knew conducted themselves the way the Mormon “family of God” do in this story. People from abusive backgrounds have problems enough with the idea of God as a Father but this story would put anyone off the idea forever! As I recount this story think about what the typical dad would do as his kids are growing up and compare it with this “exalted man.” According to Mormonism “ God created our spirits” and we lived with him in a pre-mortal existence (Mormons say “pre-existence” but it is not possible to pre-exist, i.e. to exist before you exist. The noun “existence” has to be have the prefix “pre” othe...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...