Skip to main content

The Bible is Full of Contradictions…God's Omnipotence

Is God Omnipotent?

‘The word of the LORD came to Jeremiah; ‘Behold, I am the LORD, the God of all flesh. Is anything too hard for me?’ Jer.32:27

An omnipotent God is a God who is infinitely powerful, for whom nothing is too hard. It is often thought this means there is nothing God cannot do. That sometimes prompts the question, ’Can God make a rock so big he can’t lift it?’ Here we come across something God can’t do; God cannot do something that is self-contradictory. He can’t make something that limits his own power. He can only do things that are logically possible.

Jesus taught his disciples, ‘Truly, I say to you, only with difficulty will a rich person enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished, saying, ‘Who then can be saved?’ But Jesus looked at them and said, ‘With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.’ Mt.19:23-26

Another thing God cannot do is recorded in Hebrews, ‘It is impossible for God to lie.’ Heb.6:18

It is impossible for God to lie because it is impossible for God to act against his own character. It is not a contradiction for Jehovah to say that nothing is too hard for him, for Jesus to claim ‘with God all things are possible,’ while recognising God cannot act illogically, or act against his own character.

Nor does God accommodate himself to man’s disobedience. In Judges we read:

‘And the LORD was with Judah, and took possession of the hill country, but he could not drive out the inhabitants of the plain because they had chariots of iron.’ Judges 1:19

The ‘he’ in this verse  is, of course, not the LORD, but the nearest textual antecedent, Judah. It was not the LORD who failed to drive out the inhabitants of the plain. The three cities mentioned in verse 18 – Gaza, Ashkelon, and Ekron – were in the plain, but the Israelites advances did not go beyond them. Indeed, they later reverted to Philistine control. Is the Bible contradicting itself when we compare the words of Jeremiah and Jesus with the events surrounding Israel's failure to completely drive out the Canaanites?

A pattern begins to emerge when we read on and find that The LORD was with Benjamin (v21), Manasseh (v27), Ephraim (v29), Zebulun(v30), Naphtali (v33), and Dan (v34), only for each one in turn to fail as Judah failed. Reading further, we find the root cause of their failure, as well as of their future forsaking of the LORD in worshipping false gods.

‘Now the angel of the LORD went up from Gilgal to 'Bochim. And he said I brought you up from Egypt and brought you into the land that I swore to give to your fathers. I said, "I will never break my covenant with you, 'and you shall make no covenant with the inhabitants of this land; 'you shall break down their altars.' But you have not obeyed my voice. What is this you have done? So now I say, "I will not drive them out before you, but they shall become thorns in your sides,' and their gods shall be a snare to you.As soon as the angel of the LORD spoke these words to all the people of Israel the people lifted up their voices and wept.’

It is true that the Canaanites had superior arms, but it is also true that Israel was too readily disposed to making alliances with them instead of trusting and obeying Jehovah.

God is omnipotent, but as he enters into covenants with his people he has them face the consequences of their disobedience. It is the disobedience of the Israelites that needs to be highlighted as the cause of failure, not the LORD.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Dangers of Adding to the Bible: Guest Post by Jacob Lambert

T oday, when we come across Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons we find that they are led by a group of people who hold unquestioned authority. Members of this group know this, some even believe it themselves. This puts them in a powerful position, even to the point where they can create their own Bible. Two examples are the J oseph S mith Translation of the Mormons and the N ew W orld T ranslation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. T hey can add words into their own Bible, words that are not in other, respectable, translations. F or example, in the Greek, C olossians 1:1 6 say s that J esus created all things: ‘ He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities – all things were created through him and for him.’ Col.1:15,16, ESV Jehovah’s Witnesses say that this runs counter to their understanding that Jesus is God’s first creat...

Cheers!

  In their latest update #4, the Jehovah’s Witnesses' Governing Body has announced that toasting and ‘ clinking glasses’  is now allowed at the individual Jehovah’s Witness’s ‘ bible trained conscience’ .  This, Governing Body member Stephen Lett tells us, is due to ‘ prayerful consideration’  by the Governing Body.  This doesn’t sound unreasonable; who could possibly object to toasting, it’s such an innocuous custom?  The answer to that is the Governing Body itself, until now. Ever since 1952, and possibly earlier, the Watchtower has roundly condemned this practice due to its ‘ pagan roots’  in ‘ false religion’ .  The 15 May 1952 Watchtower (page 319), has this to say on the matter Jehovah God and Christ Jesus are not honored by having pagan customs of toasting switched to them, or to human s In 1968, in an answer to  Questions from Readers,  the 1 Jan Watchtower states If a Christian is going to make a request f...