Skip to main content

Telling the Truth Means You Don't Need to Remember What You've Said Before!

 


Telling the truth means you don’t need to remember what you've said before is a valuable expression to note as it can help us to separate the lies from the truth.  The Watchtower is famous for the vast amounts of literature and information it pumps out to its members.  In recent years the number of written items has reduced, being replaced by visual media mostly on JW Broadcasting, but the sheer volume seems to be remaining the same.  This can sometimes result in slip ups in what pronouncements are made by the Governing Body.

During the recent 2024 Annual Meeting of the Jehovah’s Witnesses (available for viewing on JW Broadcasting) an announcement was made, by the Governing Body member Gerrit Losch, that two new members were being added to the Governing Body.  Those new members are Jode Jedele and Jacob Rumph who are both somewhat younger than most of the present members of the body, Rumph now being the youngest at 52.

 Losch welcomed these new members and in his address said this;

 “…we must allow the next generation to come up so they, too, can enjoy unique privileges.”

 Nothing unusual in that, you might say, it’s a good idea to bring on younger minds, the present members won’t live forever!  But notice one small slip; he talks about the ‘next' generation meaning, as we would all understand it, the younger members, perhaps sons of the people of Losch’s generation. 

Why is it a ‘slip’?  Well, a key and fundamental teaching of the Watchtower since its earliest days is that the generation that saw the start of World War one in 1914 (or, more precisely, Jesus’ invisible presence) would not die out before the end of things.  This is taken from Jesus’ words in Mathew 24 v 34.  The Watchtower originally taught that Jesus was referring to the time between His Parousia (or presence) in 1914 and Armageddon, though later the end point became less clear as either 'the end of things' or 'the start of the great tribulation'. It has been the impetus behind their frenetic evangelising that the end was always not far away as those of that generation started to die off. 

Over the years there have been a number of changes made to eke out that period. These include, amongst others; changing the start age for ‘this generation’ from those who were old enough to understand what was going on at the time (18 years old?) to those who simply saw it (10 years old) and then to those who were actually alive at the time (babies).  It soon became clear that these band-aids were not going to be enough as even the 'babies' were now heading for 100 years old!

So, in April 2010 a new ‘understanding’ of what Jesus meant by the term ‘generation’ came as ‘new light’ for Jehovah’s Witnesses.  It is what has become known outside the organisation as the ‘overlapping generation’ teaching but, technically, it is more accurately an 'overlapping lives' teaching.  The Governing Body decided that one definition of a ‘generation’ is any two lives that overlap; if two persons lived at the same point in time then they were of the same generation; this is how they defined it in that article.

  “It [a generation] usually refers to people of varying ages whose lives overlap during a particular time period; it is not excessively long; and it has an end.”

Where they get this definition from is difficult to say as dictionaries I have checked do not use this, so it can hardly be said to be the ‘usual’ use.  But, using this ‘definition’, meant that they could push back the end of ‘this generation’ to the time of death of the last ‘anointed’ person who was born before the death of the last member of the ‘anointed’ who was alive in 1914 (shown as Fred W Franz in the picture above who died in 1992, though some 'anointed' have lived longer).  

We can now see why Geritt Losch’s statement is a slip up; he talks of the ‘next' generation of younger members which, under normal usage makes sense, but, in Watchtower terms, denies their own definition of a ‘generation’. 

Both these new Governing Body members commenced their time at Bethel before Franz's death and so, by their own definition, would evidently be in the same 'generation' as all the other members of the Governing Body, including Losch, not the 'next'.  You can’t have it both ways.

There’s no evidence that Jesus meant a different meaning for a ‘generation’ to the normal usage. Matthew himself tells us what a ‘generation’ is in Jesus’ genealogy in Matthew chapter 1 v 17 and it is as you would expect; a father and son are two different generations.  Either way, it would appear that the Governing Body does not believe its own definitions so, perhaps, neither should we.

Police sometimes ask a suspected criminal the same question but in a different way to see if they will change their story and so reveal themselves; Losch has done this for us!  If you speak the truth you don’t need to remember what you said as the truth doesn’t change.  Un-truths are caught out when they change.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent

The Mormon God’s Dysfunctional Family

You know those moments when you look at something you’ve looked at a thousand times before and suddenly see something new? I was looking at a blog I found via the Google Blog Alerts service and it told the familiar story of the Mormon “ Plan of Salvation”; you can read it here. There really was nothing surprising until I started thinking about what people might think if a family they knew conducted themselves the way the Mormon “family of God” do in this story. People from abusive backgrounds have problems enough with the idea of God as a Father but this story would put anyone off the idea forever! As I recount this story think about what the typical dad would do as his kids are growing up and compare it with this “exalted man.” According to Mormonism “ God created our spirits” and we lived with him in a pre-mortal existence (Mormons say “pre-existence” but it is not possible to pre-exist, i.e. to exist before you exist. The noun “existence” has to be have the prefix “pre” othe