Skip to main content

Berean Bible Teachers Manual

 


I have a copy of the Berean Bible Teachers Manual, with the King James Bible, dated 1921. It gives, ‘Verse-by-verse comments on the entire Bible, condensed from The WatchTower, from Studies in the Scriptures, etc.’

It goes on to explain:

‘These brief comments by C J Woodworth are claimed to faithfully represent the fuller presentations of the six volumes of Studies in the Scriptures.’

The ‘etc.’ above includes comments from, ‘The Hell Pamphlet, Tabernacle Shadows, and the Spiritism Pamphlet, Zion’s Watch Tower, September 1879, a 1907 newspaper report of a sermon by Charles Russell, a 1905 Theology Quarterly, and discourses on the Chart of the Ages.’

It is incredibly well organised, its reference system clear. You may go from a Bible reference, as you would in any concordance, to a brief comment taken from one of the above publications, and if you have those publications, you may be sent to the right pages to read the context. Set alongside a set of Studies in the Scriptures, I imagine any Jehovah’s Witness of the day feeling pretty well equipped for ministry.

I say ‘of the day’ because, when I compare the output of literature of groups from the 19th and into the 20th century, it seems impressively substantial compared with that of our own day.

Think of the Mormon Journal of Discourses. It is a 26 volume collection of ‘public sermons, discourses, lectures, etc. delivered by the Presidency, the Twelve and others in this city (Salt Lake City),’ and was, in its day, warmly endorsed by church leadership. It was sold by Deseret Books as, ‘the written record of remarkable teachings from the LDS pulpit. To the clear and vigorous exposition of Latter-day saint doctrine is added the unmistakable authority of divine inspiration.’

I have reflected on my own experience of Mormonism from the early 1970’s into 1986, the time I left. The ‘house magazine’ of the church, the Ensign, had just been launched. It was ambitious, aiming at being a regular, faith-building organ of education for serious saints. As a young Latter-day Saint I felt as if a feast of meat was being put before me.

Towards its demise in 2020, the Ensign had become a pale reflection of what was being put out less than 40 years ago. Not so much meat as oatmeal. Its replacement, the Liahona, seems to be no better, more a lifestyle than a faith-building organ of depth and breadth. Mormon apologetics today comes from amateur Mormon apologists who, of course, ‘don’t speak officially for the church.’ They never do, but who does today on serious theological issues?

From the condescending tone of Watch Tower leaders on JW.ORG, to the soporific sermons of Mormon leaders twice a year at their conferences, it seems as if these groups have run out of steam. I wrote a piece for the website not so long ago explaining how ‘The Mormon God Doesn’t Thunder Any More.’ Looking at the Berean Bible Teachers Manual and the publications it references, this seems true of more than Mormons.

In thinking about witnessing to people in these groups, it seems to me there couldn’t be a better time to engage them in serious conversation – provided, of course, we have something of substance to share ourselves. As the world, the cults, and tragically so much of the church is dumbing down in a race to the bottom, it is well to remember Paul’s counsel to the saints in Corinth:

Brothers, do not be children in your thinking. Be infants in evil, but in your thinking be mature.’ 1 Corinthians 14:20

What a picture we have to present to those for whom we work and pray. What a rich table of gospel provision we can offer those malnourished folk who may, even now, be looking for somewhere better to nourish their souls.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...