The Jehovah's Witness and the Sower

The following is a contribution from Barry Amor, one of our team here at Reachout central:

I have spent many hours debating with Jehovah’s Witnesses, online, via email, and face-to-face on the carts or over a table. It is understandable how easy it can be to become disappointed with the seeming lack of effect of this time spent with them. They promise to go away and research what you have said and get back to you and yet they rarely do.

The Scriptures you show them and the arguments you present seem to wash over them with no apparent effect and you go away discouraged. By way of encouragement, though, I think an alternative look at the parable of the sower from Matthew 13:1-23 has much to help us.

There are two ways of looking at the parable in this context:

Firstly, the sower seems to accept the fact that some of the seed that he is sowing will have little or no result by way of fruit, yet he keeps sowing. Some seed will undoubtedly be wasted, but there will be a harvest of good seed and that is good enough for him.

When we sow our seed of the good news we cannot know who will respond and who will not, but we are called to sow it anyway and leave the Holy Spirit to do His work. We may never see the fruits of our sowing as we may not be called to be a harvester, so we must leave it in God’s hands to produce the crop.

A second way to look at is it that we may be called to prepare the soil for others to sow into. In the parable there is poor ground which would need to be changed to make it ready to receive the seed. There is hard ground, packed down by constant footfalls and this will need to be broken up.

Jehovah's Witnesses are told that non-Witnesses (including members of ‘Christendom’) are worldly people who are full of sin and persecute Jehovah's Witnesses. Maybe our role is simply to be ‘good’ people to them, to ‘break up’ their ground.

Perhaps you have a colleague at work, or a neighbour, who is a Jehovah's Witness and all you are called to do is to be kind to them, to show God’s love to them without judgement or trying to proselytise them.

Some ground is full of rocks with little soil; these may be bad experiences the Jehovah's Witness has had with ‘religion’ in their lives that drove them to the Watchtower. We can be a listening ear, ready to perhaps give our own good experiences of Christian living and help them to understand that ‘religion’ is not the same as faith.

Some ground is full of thorns or weeds; these ‘weeds’ are the false doctrines of the Watchtower Society which will need to be removed one by one. When you discuss with a Jehovah's Witness about the personality of the Holy Spirit, the way to eternal life, or the Christian’s hope of heaven you may simply be removing those weeds. The Jehovah's Witness may then go on to talk with other Christians in the future with many more such weeds removed.

Ground that has been poorly cultivated before will need nutrients added to make it productive and this can take some time and may need numerous applications. We may simply be putting nutrients in to the soil by speaking the gospel to them, the good news that is Jesus and forgiveness of sins. The Watchtower does not give them those nutrients, it’s all about ‘Jehovah’ and his organisation leading them to paradise through their own merit.

With the ground broken up, rocks removed, thorns and weeds uprooted, and the soil thoroughly fertilised, the way is set for the seed to be sown and fruit to come forth.

Some of us will be ground breakers, some weed killers, others those who fertilise the soil fertilizers, and only some will be harvesters, but we are all just as important in the overall scheme. We mustn’t become downhearted in God’s work. We must do our bit and leave the Holy Spirit to co-ordinate the work to achieve the aim of bringing these people into the kingdom.

'I planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the growth.' 1 Corinthians 3:6

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...

Bridge of Reason

Search This Blog