Skip to main content

Cult Members are Seeking Answers

 It is often asked, how can anyone fall for this or that cult? Behind the question is an assumption; these people are gullible. But they are neither gullible, nor are they dumb. In fact, most people who join cults are intelligent and capable. That much is clear from the fact they so often come along asking important questions about life.

From our vantage point we might compare a cult’s teaching with our own experience and understanding, but that is not where the cult member is standing. Imagine a scale of 1-10:


1------2------3------4------5------6------7------8------9------10


Number ten represents the complete cult experience. Number one represents what most regard as the received orthodoxy of the faith, where we stand when we agree on the fundamentals. It is from this viewpoint that you survey the cult scene and judge others ‘dumb for falling for this stuff.’ The ‘others’ you are looking at stand, shall we say, at point seven on this scale.

It is well to remember the person whose judgement you are questioning didn’t start at number seven. Indeed, they may well have once stood where you are, so how did they get to where they are today? They began by going from number one to number two which, while admittedly rather unconventional, nevertheless has a lot going for it.

It’s close enough to the truth (number 1) to have a halo effect, to be familiar such that we don’t question, we too readily trust. It is also just far enough from established orthodoxy to be exciting, intriguing, worth investigation. The modern church is awash with examples of this phenomenon; apostles, prophets, signs and wonders, worshiptainment, ‘touch the screen and feel my sincerity.’ The local Mormon Church, or the local Kingdom Hall typically achieve this halo effect by being warm and welcoming to visitors, by appearing a lot like church.

It is in the process of membership that a person moves along the scale until they get to the higher numbers, closer to the full cult experience. When we witness to them it is easy to stand at number one, the place of orthodox, where they perhaps started, and wonder in frustration why they simply can’t ‘see it!’ The reason they don’t immediately see the error compared to the truth is because of another phenomenon – baseline shifting.

Our baseline in this example is at number one, the established orthodoxy. Baseline shifting describes a gradual change in the accepted norms due to a failure to understand, to even remember the accepted standards of, in our example, the wider faith group. When we look at someone at number seven, we compare that position to our still established baseline. For them, however, the baseline has shifted repeatedly, until the person’s baseline is number seven, or at best number six.


This is the experience of Mormons who, starting with the local ward experience, progress to temple worthiness and attendance, 
which is light years away from where they started. They have been taught to see this as spiritual progress in orthodoxy, not departure from orthodoxy, because this has been a journey.

So, they have started with something familiar enough to win their trust, but novel and esoteric enough to be intriguing (the halo effect) and ended with a complete shift in their baseline such that, had they seen at the beginning all that would develop they might never have taken the journey.

How many Jehovah’s Witnesses could tell the same story as they walk ever so slowly to the next door to knock softly in the hope...well, you know what I mean. I wonder how many ask, ‘How did I get here?’

Be patient, start from where they are and don’t expect them to start where you are. Don’t take anything for granted. Just because they hold a Bible doesn’t mean they have any idea how to use and understand it, it’s authority, it’s message. Speak grace and bring them to the cross to see what God has done in Christ. Above all, don’t witness for results, this is a marathon not a sprint, but witness for faithfulness’ sake, for the one who called us to be his witnesses.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...