Skip to main content

The Reactivating of Christ’s Life Pattern (Resurrection)

 


The Watch Tower Society teaches that when Jesus died he went out of existence. It required Jehovah God to raise him because he was only in God’s memory:

Resurrection involves a reactivating of the life pattern of the individual, which life pattern God has retained in his memory.’ Reasoning from the Scriptures, 1985, p.333

They also say Jesus was resurrected as a spirit, having no physical body. He simply materialised bodies to suit the occasion:

It is true that Jesus appeared in physical form to his disciples after his resurrection. But on certain occasions, why did they not at first recognise him?...Jesus evidently materialised bodies on these occasions, as angels had done in the past when appearing to humans. Disposing of Jesus’ physical body at the time of his resurrection presented no problem for God. Interestingly, although the physical body was not left by God in the tomb (evidently to strengthen the conviction of the disciples that Jesus had actually been raised), the linen cloths in which it had been wrapped were left there; yet, the resurrected Jesus always appeared fully clothed.’ Reasoning from the Scriptures, 1985, pp 217/8

Commenting on Luke 24:36-39, a key resurrection text, they write:

Humans cannot see spirit, so the disciples evidently thought they were seeing an apparition or a vision...Jesus assured them that he was no apparition; they could see his body of flesh and could touch him, feeling the bones; he also ate in their presence...Following his resurrection, Jesus did not always appear in the same body of flesh (perhaps to reinforce n their minds the fact that he was a spirit), and so he was not immediately recognisable even by his close associates. (John 20:14,15; 21:4-7) However, by his repeatedly appearing to them in materialised bodies...he strengthened their faith in the fact that he truly had been resurrected from the dead.’ Reasoning from the Scriptures, 1985, pp 334/335

Well, Yes...Evidently

This has to be one of the most confusing things I have ever read, and I used to be a Mormon. We will come to ‘proof-texts’ presently, but let’s see if we can unpack this jumble of guesses, surmises, and wild leaps of conjecture. I do wonder if they understand what ‘evidentially’ means. They offer no evidence as such, using the word as a synonym for ‘apparently’ or ‘it seems apparent.’ There is a lot of guesswork going on here.

Where does Scripture say our life pattern is retained in God’s memory? Having decided what they believe, i.e. when you’re dead you’re dead, they make up phrases and ideas not found in Scripture to explain the resurrection of something that no longer exists. There is a lot of guesswork here.

Jesus is resurrected a spirit, which presents a problem. How does Jesus convince the disciples he is the resurrected Christ? ‘Evidently’ he ‘materialises a body’ to fit the moment.See my hands and my feet,’ he says to them, ‘that it is I myself. Touch me, and see. For a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see that I have.” Luke 24:39

The evidence of his resurrection is his physicality, but this is manufactured evidence. He is not really a physical being at all, but a spirit. This then creates another problem; he wants them to know he is a spirit, but he has just presented his physical body as evidence to the contrary. Why is it important they know he is a spirit? That question is left hanging. So, what will he do?

Following his resurrection, Jesus did not always appear in the same body of flesh (perhaps to reinforce n their minds the fact that he was a spirit), and so he was not immediately recognisable even by his close associates.’

He appeared many times to his followers and I have this picture in my mind of yet another ‘stranger’ turning up, the disciples wondering who this might be, and one of them saying, ‘Oh, I think it’s Jesus again. I wish he wouldn’t keep doing that, we’re nervous enough about the Romans and the temple authorities without him turning up, a stranger in our midst, time and again.’

What about his dead body?

Disposing of Jesus’ physical body at the time of his resurrection presented no problem for God. (I am sure it wouldn’t have) Interestingly, although the physical body was not left by God in the tomb (evidently to strengthen the conviction of the disciples that Jesus had actually been raised) the linen cloths in which it had been wrapped were left there; yet, the resurrected Jesus always appeared fully clothed.’

Not only a new identity each time but a change of wardrobe! But Jesus was not buried in his day clothes, he was buried wrapped in linen with spices brought by Nicodemus (John 19:39-40). The winding sheets of his burial and the clothes they subsequently saw him wearing have nothing to do with each other.

Finally, we are told, ‘the physical body was not left by God in the tomb (evidently to strengthen the conviction of the disciples that Jesus had actually been raised)’ So…

The absence of a body in the tomb is evidence Jesus is risen – ‘evidently’ physically resurrected.

The evidence of ‘a body of flesh and bones’ reinforces this conviction, along with Jesus’ words, ‘a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see me have.’ Luke 24:39

The appearances of Jesus in different guises, however, are meant, in some obscure way, to convey the idea he is not physically resurrected. The disciples, nevertheless, are supposed to glean from this contradictory evidence that Jesus is a spirit, that they were right all along in that upper room, and Jesus hoodwinked them.

There is a wacky internal logic to this, I am sure, but in the cold light of day it makes no sense at all. I am now going to lie down in a darkened room. Next week we will look at proof-texts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Times of the Gentiles - by Dawn Partington

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that “the times of the gentiles” is a time period of 2,520 years, beginning in 607BC and ending in AD1914. According to their doctrine, Jesus was enthroned as King in AD1914 when the “gentile times” ended. 1. Only one verse in scripture mentions “the times of the gentiles”: 'They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.'  Luke 21:24 NIV. The Jehovah's Witness organisation has linked this one verse with other prophetic passages to calculate the supposed length of these “gentile times”, notably a time period which began hundreds of years before the incarnation and ended over 1900 years after it. 2. Simple examination of the text of Luke 21 reveals what Jesus was referring to when he used the phrase “the times of the gentiles”. Let's look at the passage together and distil this into four points which you may...

How Will Jehovah Forgive Us

  The June 2022 Watchtower Article 24 titled “ Jehovah—The Greatest Forgiver ” attempts to paint a picture of Jehovah as a wise, just, and knowledgeable judge – which, of course He is.  However, it also shows Him as a judge who has a number of requirements before He will forgive.  The article quotes numerous Old Testament scriptures showing that Jehovah will forgive our transgressions and agrees that this forgiveness is made possible through Jesus dying for our sins, though it doesn’t mention the covenant this sacrifice generated. As Christians we would understand that Jesus’ sacrifice, the shedding of His blood, pays for our sins so that a just God can be merciful and forgive them; the price for those sins has already been paid (1 Cor 6 v 20, Heb 9 v 22). In contrast, the Watchtower article talks of there being other requirements for Jehovah’s forgiveness.  It states that, before Jehovah will decide to offer forgiveness, “ He needs to be able to consider...