Skip to main content

Answering Catholicism – Scripture and Tradition



"Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture make up a single sacred deposit of the Word of God"[1]

At the time of the Reformation, the Church of Rome taught that the Word of God consisted of both the written word (The Bible) and the unwritten word (Tradition). It held that both Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition were both infallible and of equal value. The Roman Catholic Church believes the same today.

What does the Roman Catholic Church mean by tradition? The website Catholic Answers says that:

Divine Tradition comes from God, either through the written word of the Bible or through the oral teaching of Christ himself or his apostles. Because it is revealed by God, divine Tradition may not be altered by men.[2]

The Reformers vehemently denied that this ‘divine Tradition’, said to be found within the Roman Catholic Church, was in anyway comparable with God’s written word. For them, the Bible was the true only rule of faith for the Christian. The Protestant Church believes the same today.

The Roman Catholic View

Catholics believe that the true rule of faith is the Bible plus apostolic tradition. This, they claim, is expressed in the teaching authority of the Roman Catholic Church, which they call the Magisterium (which consists of the Pope and his bishops).

Collectively then, Scared Scripture and Sacred Tradition known as the Deposit of Faith, is interpreted and dispensed to the faithful by the Magisterium.

‘Both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honoured with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence’[3]


The Bible and Tradition

What are we to make of this so-called Sacred Tradition? What does the Bible say about tradition?

So then, brothers, stand firm and hold to the traditions that you were taught by us, either by our spoken word or by our letter. 2 Thessalonians 2:15

Now I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the traditions even as I delivered them to you. 1 Corinthians 11:2

Now we command you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from any brother who is walking in idleness and not in accord with the tradition that you received from us. 2 Thessalonians 3:6

In these three verses in Scripture, tradition is mentioned in a positive way. In each case, the traditions mentioned have already been taught and delivered to the church. Note also that the source of these traditions is the apostles themselves.

Therefore ‘new’ traditions which arise after the death of the Apostles are to be considered extra-biblical and are not to be accepted. Note Jude’s words:

Beloved, although I was very eager to write to you about our common salvation, I found it necessary to write appealing to you to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints. Jude 1:3

We are urged to contend for the faith that was once for all delivered. Jude’s words are the ancient equivalent of a message from Amazon… your package has been delivered and your order is complete. He is teaching that there is nothing new to come- the faith has been once for all delivered.

Other references to tradition in Scripture, warn against adding to that which has already been delivered:

See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. Colossians 2:8

He answered them, “And why do you break the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition? Matthew 15:3

These verses, rather than commending the traditions handed on by the apostles, are condemning of traditions that find their source outside of Holy Writ. These words speak directly to the Roman Catholic Church and their so-called ‘Sacred Tradition’.

Examples of some of the extra-biblical traditions found within this church are the perpetual virginity and bodily assumption of Mary, prayers to saints, prayers for the dead, Purgatory, and indulgences.

These traditions, and they have many more, nullify the Word of God. They break the commandment of God for the sake of their traditions.

It was such traditions, which stood in the place of Scripture, that caused the Protestant Reformers to make their stand and declare the Latin phrase: Sola Scriptura – Scripture Alone.

Semper Eadem – Always the Same

This call to return to the Bible is as needed now as it was then. The Roman Catholic Church remains the same. Not only has this Church not changed its doctrines, but it continues to proclaim that itself to be the Church that Christ Himself established.

Many Protestants have forgotten the huge sacrifice made to set them free from the fallacious and superstitious nonsense, called Sacred Tradition, served up within the Roman Catholic Church.

What is the Roman Catholic Church’s justification for their Sacred Tradition?

Apostolic Succession.

In my next article we will consider why this teaching cannot be supported by Scripture.




[1]
Catechism of the Catholic Church paragraph 97

[2] What exactly does the Church mean by tradition? | Catholic Answers

[3] Catechism of the Catholic Church paragraph 82

Comments

Tobi said…
I agree the Catholic Church has lauded itself over us for centuries. Many of the comments in your article I agreed with thoroughly. However, it was disappointing to see that you did not mention Sunday sabbath which was created by the Catholic Church. Nowhere in the Bible will you find instructions from God to change the sabbath. The sabbath remains to be Saturday. It would be interesting to see an article by you on this subject.
Michael Thomas said…
Hi Tobi, are you a Seventh-day Adventist? There is an extensive article on the Reachout Trust website addressing the question:

https://reachouttrust.org/why-worship-on-a-sunday/

I hope you find it helpful.

Blessings

Michael Thomas
Chairman

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Times of the Gentiles - by Dawn Partington

Jehovah's Witnesses teach that “the times of the gentiles” is a time period of 2,520 years, beginning in 607BC and ending in AD1914. According to their doctrine, Jesus was enthroned as King in AD1914 when the “gentile times” ended. 1. Only one verse in scripture mentions “the times of the gentiles”: 'They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.'  Luke 21:24 NIV. The Jehovah's Witness organisation has linked this one verse with other prophetic passages to calculate the supposed length of these “gentile times”, notably a time period which began hundreds of years before the incarnation and ended over 1900 years after it. 2. Simple examination of the text of Luke 21 reveals what Jesus was referring to when he used the phrase “the times of the gentiles”. Let's look at the passage together and distil this into four points which you may...

How Will Jehovah Forgive Us

  The June 2022 Watchtower Article 24 titled “ Jehovah—The Greatest Forgiver ” attempts to paint a picture of Jehovah as a wise, just, and knowledgeable judge – which, of course He is.  However, it also shows Him as a judge who has a number of requirements before He will forgive.  The article quotes numerous Old Testament scriptures showing that Jehovah will forgive our transgressions and agrees that this forgiveness is made possible through Jesus dying for our sins, though it doesn’t mention the covenant this sacrifice generated. As Christians we would understand that Jesus’ sacrifice, the shedding of His blood, pays for our sins so that a just God can be merciful and forgive them; the price for those sins has already been paid (1 Cor 6 v 20, Heb 9 v 22). In contrast, the Watchtower article talks of there being other requirements for Jehovah’s forgiveness.  It states that, before Jehovah will decide to offer forgiveness, “ He needs to be able to consider...