Things Mormons Cannot Do

I recently read a blog post by a Latter-day Saint named Jim Harmer entitled ‘A complete list of things Mormons can’t do.’

He began by saying this:

As a life-long member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, I’m asked with frequency what things I “can and can’t do.” That’s always been a little funny of a question to me because I, just like you, can do whatever I want.[1]

Is this true? Can Jim do whatever he wants?

Yes and No

Important within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day is the idea of ‘agency’. Mormonism teaches that we are free agents with the ability to choose good or bad. Agency was given to all Heavenly Father’s spirit children in their pre-mortal state and now, in mortal life, it is to be used to ‘choose the right’.[2]

So, while Mormons like Jim, in theory, have the freedom to do whatever they want, in practice choice is not a real option if they want to remain in good standing in the church.

Most, if not all, cultic groups operate in this way. Members truly believe that they are free to do as they please. They claim that they have freedom to leave or remain, but they are in fact beholden to the system which controls them. Jim goes on to say:

The reason that I CHOOSE to live a certain way as a devout member of the church of Jesus Christ is not because I’m afraid of punishment or to try and make myself look better than anyone else. I choose to follow God’s commandments because I want to be happy, and I believe the commandments are the right foundation for helping me to be a good man.[3]

Did you spot that? Jim says that the reason he chooses to live a certain way is because he is a ‘devout member of the Church of Jesus Christ’. If he wants to be devout to the church, he must ‘choose’ to follow all its commandments. Though Jim sincerely believes he is choosing to follow Jesus, he is obligated to follow the laws and ordinances of his church.

I’m sure Jim thinks he is free, but let’s follow the trail.

Jim says he wants to be happy and to be a good man. He believes that these things come by following God’s commandments. Which commandments? The commandments given him by the Mormon church and its leaders.

Jim believes that he belongs to the true church, the restored church, with all its precepts deriving from God. For him to choose against doing what they teach would be seen as rebellion against God, so does Jim really have the ability to choose?

Following the Commandments

Latter-day Saints believe that commandments are divine directives for righteous living; bring happiness and spiritual and temporal blessings; and are part of God's way to redeem his children and endow them with eternal life. Therefore, commandments provide not only a test of faith, obedience, and love for God and Jesus Christ but also an opportunity to experience love from God and joy both in this life and in the life to come. Commandments are received by revelation directly from deity or through his prophets. Written accounts of such revelations are contained in the scriptures, which include the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price.[4]

For Jim, the commandments he ‘chooses’ to follow come from his firm belief that the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the restored church of Christ in the world today. Therefore, he will adhere to their rules for conduct.

In his article, Jim lists several rules that the devout Latter-day Saint, must follow, many of which would to be applicable, not only to a Mormon but also to a true Christian. It should not surprise us though, that they put they own spin on them.

Next time I will unpack further what Mormons can and cannot do.

[1] A Complete List of Things Mormons Can’t Do – Purpose in Christ
[2] Choose the Right (churchofjesuschrist.org)
[3] Ibid
[4] Commandments - The Encyclopedia of Mormonism (byu.edu)

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...

Bridge of Reason

Search This Blog