Skip to main content

Guess Who’s Back?

 


Friends, it is happening. After two and a half years of not door knocking, the Jehovah’s Witnesses have been given permission by the Governing Body to return to house-to-house publishing today – September 1st, 2022.

After reporting of their great success in letter-writing, phone calls and online bible studies during the Covid pandemic, I like many, wondered if they would ever return to our streets. But they are back.

Many Jehovah’s Witnesses have spoken of their great joy in being able to get back on the doors. Social media is awash with sentiments like ‘Yes’, ‘Can’t wait’, ‘So excited’, but for every positive post I saw, I believe there will be an equal number wanting to scream ‘Nooooooooo’.

Knocking on people’s doors is hard work. I speak as someone who has done it as a JW and a Christian, and I can say with the utmost conviction that it is much easier to write letters. Still, you cannot be a Jehovah’s Witness and say ‘no’ to door-knocking, or rather say ‘no’ to the Faithful and Discreet Slave.

The devoted need not be overly concerned though, as Governing Body member David H. Splaine told the faithful of the heavenly help they can expect:

‘It's all so exciting that will return to the house-to-house ministry starting September 1st just in time for our worldwide campaign to start Bible studies. I'm sure the angels are going to be excited too because it will give them opportunities to help us with our ministry.’[1]

Really? It is almost like Splaine is suggesting that the angels also took a Covid break. They have been hanging around twiddling their thumbs until the Governing Body told them they could play out again. I can assure David Splaine that if any angels do support the work of JW.org, they are not the good ones!

Continuing his update from the Governing Body, Splaine went on to say:

‘We pray for Jehovah's rich blessing on our efforts to offer Bible studies to as many people as possible. It has been so refreshing to resume more and more of our theocratic activities in person. We are grateful for the good direction Jehovah has provided. It strengthens our faith in him and our confidence in his organisation.’[2]

Here is where the problems lie for ordinary Jehovah’s Witnesses. They are bound by two entities that do not exist – Jehovah and his organisation. The god they call Jehovah is neither the God revealed in scripture, nor the God revealed in the person of the Lord Jesus Christ. It therefore follows, that this god does not have an organisation representing him on the earth. The Bible nowhere speaks of God having an earthly organisation, lead by eight men in suits in New York. How terribly sad it is that these poor lost people believe that when these men shout ‘Jump’, they must respond with ‘How high?’.

The Terrible World

David Splaine continues by feeding the Jehovah’s Witnesses fear of the world around them. Everything outside of the organisation is bad, so if you want to be safe, trust those who love you and care for you. He compares the confidence they have in Jehovah and his organisation with those on the outside:

‘What a contrast with the world. People today are suffering from a crisis of confidence. They have doubts about whether the people they look up to, the politicians, scientists, and businessmen, really have their best interests at heart. They wonder, do they really care about me or are they just out for themselves?’[3]

The Terrible Church

Not wanting to leave it there, Splaine takes the obligatory shot at the church:

‘What about the clergy of Christendom? They have lost respect for them too, so it's not surprising that they are sceptical about the book the clergy claims to represent, the Bible’.[4]

Splaine here speaks with partial truth. As Christianity wains in the increasingly secular west, people have indeed lost respect for the clergy. But what he fails to acknowledge is that the ‘world’ equally has no respect for the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses, and they would be equally sceptical of their New World Mistranslation of the Holy Scriptures.

The Bible

Splaine goes on to say:

How can we help people to have the same confidence in God's word that we have? Let's consider three reasons why we can trust the Bible?

The three reasons he gives concern the accuracy of transmission, the prophecies contained within, and changed lives. I would agree that these are all great reasons to trust the Bible, but there are problems with each of the examples he uses.

Accuracy

Splaine points out that though we do not have any original manuscripts, the copies we have can be proven accurate. He says:

‘…because of human imperfection some small errors crept into the Bible text, but modern scholars have a reliable way of identifying those errors.

Suppose one hundred men are assigned to copy a page of text and one of the men makes a slight error in his copy. Now one way we could find that error is by comparing his copy with the ninety-nine others. Similarly, by comparing a number of Bible manuscripts, scholars are able to identify errors or omissions that one copyist made. These can be corrected, so we can have confidence that our modern bibles accurately reflect God’s message to mankind.’[5]

He is correct, but oh the irony. If only Jehovah’s Witnesses would compare their New World Translation with other Biblical translations. If only they would allow scholars to identify errors and omissions made by the anonymous New World Translation Committee.

Prophecy

I have often used the argument of fulfilled prophecies as evidence of the Bible’s divine origin. Most apologists would point to the prophecies fulfilled in the life of Jesus to support their thesis, but not the Governing Body. Rather than pointing people to Jesus, David Splaine uses the oft-used Watchtower prophecy of Daniel[6] regarding the Anglo-American world power. In using this so-called prophecy, he keeps Jehovah’s Witnesses on high alert as the end is playing out before their very eyes.  

Changed Lives

Finally, David Splaine spoke about how following the Bible’s advice changes people’s lives. I would certainly agree that the Bible can and does change lives, but we need to listen carefully to the words he uses. He says:

‘Let's see how following the Bible’s advice affected a violent criminal we will call Jack’.

When Splaine speaks about the ‘Bible’s advice’, he goes on to explain that he is speaking of the teachings of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

‘Now Jack was in prison waiting for the death sentence to be carried out. He had the reputation of being one of the most dangerous inmates on death row. One day Jack sat in on a Bible study and he was impressed by the love the kindness of the brothers who were conducting the study, he asked for his own study. As he applied what he was learning, his conduct and personality began to change. In time he got baptised. During his time in prison, he helped at least four of the inmates to learn the truth. When the day of his execution arrived one of his lawyers said: ‘Jack is not the same person I knew 20 years ago. The teachings of Jehovah's Witnesses have changed his life.’ Well we know that it is the Bible that changes lives.’[7]

We know that religious instruction can change a person’s outward appearance and demeanour. It can reform a person’s character, yet not in any way deal with the real issue.

When I joined the Jehovah’s Witnesses, my character and attitude changed. I began to dress differently and speak differently. I became more moral. I stopped all the things that they told me offended Jehovah like celebrating my birthday and Christmas. Yes, I changed but I didn’t know God’s unconditional forgiveness. I didn’t know grace. I didn’t have the right Jesus and so I had no relationship with the Father, but I did have religion.

It isn’t following the Bible’s (Watchtower’s) advice that delivers a person from sin or brings assurance of salvation to a person’s soul. It is repentance and then faith in the One who died and rose again. This is what the Bible teaches. This is the gospel that saves and truly changes lives. If only these poor, lost, blind, people would trust Jesus alone for their eternal security.



[1] https://www.jw.org/en/news/jw/region/global/2022-Governing-Body-Update-6/

[2] ibid

[3] ibid

[4] ibid

[5] ibid

[6] Daniel 2:41-43

[7] https://www.jw.org/en/news/jw/region/global/2022-Governing-Body-Update-6/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...