Skip to main content

Why Cults gain Converts from Christian Churches.

 


Do you know someone who has left a church to join a cult? Sadly, I have heard many stories of those who have left behind Christian fellowship to join Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, or some other cultic group. Why does this happen?

I want to suggest three possible reasons:

i) Those who leave were just Church attenders.

ii) Those who leave were Church members but not members of the Church.

iii) Those who leave were ill-informed believers.

They were just Church attenders.
You may have heard it said that just as going to McDonalds doesn’t make you a Big Mac, so going to Church doesn’t make you a Christian. We may smile, but we understand the truth of this. Attending somewhere is not evidence of affiliation.

Many people will attend church because of tradition. It is something they have always done. Perhaps they were brought to church as a child, perhaps they were christened and confirmed and have just continued with church because that’s what they do. For such as these, the church is a place to gather socially, to catch up with friends or somewhere to take the kids on a Sunday morning. Yet they rarely get involved in anything else in the church. For example, you would never find them in a midweek Bible study group, nor would they be able to tell you anything substantive about the Christian faith. This should not surprise us. Jesus warned that amongst the wheat there would be tares.

Those in this category need to hear the gospel and to be convicted of their sin. They need to be called to true repentance and faith in the Lord Jesus. Once born-again, they then need to be taught the basics of the Christian faith. After which, they need to be trained in how defend the faith which was once and for all delivered to the Saints.

They were Church members but not members of the Church.
This second group is a step along from the church attenders. They are church members. These people do get involved in the life of the church, but usually only in social ways. They volunteer for most things, making the tea, cleaning the church, collecting, and sorting charitable donations. They may even have a job-title and a position in the church. Their face and name may even be on the noticeboard. They feel very much at home in the church, and it plays a big part in their life, but they don’t really connect with all that ‘bible stuff’. If they do, they only ever have a very superficial understanding of the Christian faith. They know that God loves them, and that Jesus died on the cross, but they are not sure why. When asked ‘Who is Jesus?’, they may respond by saying that he was a good person, a prophet, an example to follow but they don’t understand, or believe, that Jesus was God.

Such as these have never truly been born-again and understood the faith. Though they are seen as ‘members’ of the local physical church, they are not members of the worldwide spiritual Church, that which is the body of Christ, of which He is the head. They too need to repent, put their faith in Christ and be taught biblical truth.

They were ignorant believers.
This final group is the most troubling of all. Here we have those who have seemingly repented of their sins and put their faith in Jesus. They have perhaps been involved in church and bible study groups for years and attended numerous Christian conferences. They may have a testimony of coming to Christ. They can speak of a time when they were convicted and saw their need of Jesus, but they have only ever had a superficial understanding of Biblical truth. They never grew in the Word of God and so, at best, became stunted disciples. They could perhaps articulate Christian teaching but have never been able to defend it. Because of their lack of understanding, they left themselves exposed to falsehood. Though they should have been on solid food, they never progressed from milk, so when they opened the door to the cultist, they had no defence and were led into untruth.

Many are called, but few are trained.
When I was in my teens, I was invited to join a basketball team. I had never played basketball in my life, but my friend thought I would be good because I was tall-ish. I went along and was welcomed into the team. I began to be trained how to play the game. I was taught the rules, taught about offense and defence, how to hold the ball, catch the ball and throw the ball etc. How strange it would have been for me to be received into the team and then not be trained, yet this is what happens time and again in the church.

We welcome people into our churches, we encourage and celebrate their attendance and then act like they have arrived. They are never trained or instructed in the way of the Lord. In the past, new converts were trained through a process named catechesis.

Catechize Me
Catechism (from the Greek word catechesis) is simply instruction in the basic doctrines of the Christian faith. Instead of replacing or supplanting the role of the Bible in Christian education, catechism ideally serves as the basis for it. For the practice of catechism, as properly understood, is the Christian equivalent of looking at the box top of a jig-saw puzzle before one starts to put all of those hundreds of little pieces together.[1]

Catechesis a pattern of religious instruction. Newly converted Christians would be instructed in the Christian faith, and so become competent in their use of the Scriptures. This took place often in the form of questions and answers.

The advantage that the cultists have over the average Christian is that they have usually been catechised in what they believe. This means that they not only know thoroughly what they believe, they also know how to defend it. The untrained, untaught Christian is no match for the informed cult member. So many times, I have heard those who were once in our churches, who have later joined cults, say things like: ‘Well, I never did understand that trinity stuff anyway. I now realise after looking at the bible with… (fill in the blank), that it is not Biblical doctrine.’

How sad it is when the church loses people to cults because they have never been properly taught, discipled, or catechised. Friends, we must do better. It is not enough to only inform believers what to believe, but they also need to know why they should believe it. That way, they won’t be tossed back and forth, by any wave of cultic doctrine, but rather they will be able to stand firm, competent in the Scriptures having been instructed in the way of the Lord.[2]




[1] The Importance and Practice of Catechism — Christ Reformed Church
[2] Acts 18:24-25

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...