Skip to main content

The Truth About Mormonism - P is for Priesthood



Brad Wilcox could easily have said P is for playing, for as he continues to teach the Mormon youth, he tells them that all, except Mormons, are playing at church.

Here he again speaks of what the Mormon church truly believes. According to Mormon doctrine, all other churches have no authority to administer any sacraments (sacred ordinances), neither can they aid you as you seek to return to Heavenly Father. They are not churches approved of by God – no they are just playing church.

Authority and Priesthood

Brad continues his denigration of mainstream Christianity by saying:

They’re sincere, they want it to count, but they don’t have the authority. They don’t have God’s permission. So that the things they do really count on Earth and in eternity. Man, I want what I’m doing to count. And to be able to have that, we have to have the priesthood. We have to have that.’

What does he mean by authority and priesthood?

From its beginnings the Mormon church has taught it is the restored church of Jesus Christ. It teaches that the authority Jesus gave to the early church was lost after the death of the Apostles. Since then, the church has been in a state of total apostasy. That was until, in nineteenth century America when, through the prophet Joseph Smith, God re-established authority to the church through the restoration of the priesthood.

‘Our Heavenly Father has great power. This power is called the priesthood. By this priesthood power the heavens and the earth were created. By this power, the universe is kept in perfect order. Our Heavenly Father shares his priesthood power with his children on the earth. It is the power and authority by which those are ordained to this power act in his name to do his work… We must have priesthood authority to act in the name of God to perform the sacred ordinances of the gospel…. If a man does not have the priesthood, even though he may be sincere, the Lord will not recognize ordinances performed by him… Men need the priesthood to preside in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the LDS Church)…’[1]

Mormonism teaches that there are two priesthoods, which are available to men only, and they can only be found within the LDS Church. It is only those who hold the so-called Aaronic or Melchizedek priesthood, that have authority from God. That is why converts to Mormonism, from a Christian church, would need to be re-baptised because these sacred ordinances were not presided over by someone with authority.

‘Presumptuous and blasphemous are they who purport to baptize, bless, marry, or perform other sacraments in the name of the Lord while in fact lacking his specific authorization’[2]

Marriage

To drive home his point, Brad launches into a tale of when he had a conversation with a lady who had just been to her wedding rehearsal. She was apparently upset because the preacher had said the words ‘till death us do part’. She said: “I feel like I’m getting divorced. The day I’m getting married”. Brad tells of how he saw this as a ‘missionary moment’, an opportunity to tell her that his church believed that marriage could be for time and eternity.

He goes on:

‘So she went to the minister, and she said, “May I write my own ceremony?”, and he said, “For an extra fee”. So she paid the extra money, and she wrote her own ceremony. And I sat there in that Protestant church and listened as the preacher sealed them for time and all eternity. I couldn’t believe it. I mean, I’m freaking out. I’m like, “Whoa!” Everybody in the church was like, “That is so special”, I was like, “That is so wrong! That’s just, like, wrong!. Like lightning bolt wrong.” Why? It’s a free country. They can say whatever they want to say. Why did I feel it was wrong? Authority. No authority. They just didn’t have permission to say those words. And so did it count eternally? No, because they were playing church, and in our church, we don’t play church. We have the authority to make that count on Earth and in heaven. And that is something I don’t want to say goodbye to.’

Brad was right to say that the preacher officiating at this lady’s wedding had no authority to seal the couple for time and all eternity, but not for the reasons Brad believes.

Jesus on Marriage

Concerning marriage Jesus, in answering the Sadducees questions regarding the resurrection, said:

“You are wrong, because you know neither the Scriptures nor the power of God.  For in the resurrection they neither marry nor are given in marriage, but are like angels in heaven. (Matthew 22:29-30)

Now Brad says the preacher was wrong to say what he said because he didn’t have the authority of the Mormon priesthood, but, the preacher was wrong to say those words because he didn’t have the authority of Scripture. He, like Brad, is wrong because he ‘knew not the Scriptures nor the power of God’. Mormonism contradicts the clear teaching of Jesus on the issue of marriage.

Now I understand why they may long for marriage for time and eternity. It is difficult for us to comprehend leaving behind all we know and love. But I would propose that we will be so taken by the object of our worship, with God Himself, that all we have known in this life will pale into insignificance.

Then I looked, and I heard around the throne and the living creatures and the elders the voice of many angels, numbering myriads of myriads and thousands of thousands, saying with a loud voice,

“Worthy is the Lamb who was slain,
to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might
and honour and glory and blessing!”

And I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth and in the sea, and all that is in them, saying,

“To him who sits on the throne and to the Lamb
be blessing and honour and glory and might forever and ever!”

And the four living creatures said, “Amen!” and the elders fell down and worshipped.

Revelation 5:11-14

Charles Spurgeon said: 

“You will never glory in God till first of all God has killed your glorying in yourself.”

In making an idol of marriage and the family, Mormons fail to truly glory in God.

In part two, I will address the most controversial part of Brad’s talk, the part for which he had to make a public apology.


[1] Gospel Principles, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, p.73

[2] Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p.494

 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...