Skip to main content

Mormonism – Islam in Disguise? Doctrine Matters


Did you know, that though Mormonism and Islam claim to have a book given to them by God (Book of Mormon and the Qur’an), little of what these religions believe, teach and practice derive from these books?

This is in complete contrast with Christianity, which also claims to have a book given by God (the Bible), but for Christians, pretty much everything that they believe, teach and practice comes from this book.

So, if not from their primary sacred texts, where do Mormons and Muslims get their doctrine?

Thus, Saith the Prophet – Doctrine and Covenants

Mormons claim four sacred texts namely, The Holy Bible (King James Version); The Book of Mormon; Doctrine and Covenants and The Pearl of Great Price. Of these, it is Doctrine and Covenants that provides the Mormons with most of their doctrine.

The LDS website says:

The Doctrine and Covenants is a collection of divine revelations and inspired declarations given for the establishment and regulation of the kingdom of God on the earth in the last days. Although most of the sections are directed to members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, the messages, warnings, and exhortations are for the benefit of all mankind and contain an invitation to all people everywhere to hear the voice of the Lord Jesus Christ, speaking to them for their temporal well-being and their everlasting salvation. Most of the revelations in this compilation were received through Joseph Smith Jr., the first prophet and president of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.[1]

Conveniently, the Doctrine and Covenants record that the Lord said to the Prophet Joseph Smith, “This generation shall have my word through you”[2]

Now, honest Mormons will acknowledge that though they believe the Bible and the Book of Mormon to be of divine origin, nearly all their unique beliefs find their basis in what the Lord told Joseph Smith, as recorded in Doctrine and Covenants.

The Doctrine and Covenants is the binding link between the Book of Mormon and the continuing work of the Restoration through the Prophet Jospeh Smith and his successors. In the Doctrine and Covenants we learn of temple work, eternal families, the degrees of glory, Church organisation, and many other great truths of the Restoration.”[3]

Therefore, it is to the words Joseph Smith, found in Doctrine and Covenants, that faithful Mormons look to discover what the ‘Lord’ would have them to do. You cannot be a devoted Latter-day Saint and not have a testimony of the Prophet Joseph Smith. To be acceptable to the God of Mormonism one must believe and practice that which was taught by the founding Prophet.

Thus, Saith the Prophet – The Hadith

In like manner, faithful Muslims must have a testimony of the Prophet Muhammad. That is that they must acknowledge that Muhammad was a prophet sent by Allah.

And, just as Mormons look to a source other than their primary text to discover how they can live a life pleasing to God, so do Muslims. In fact, for Muslims, how a person lives is far more important than doctrine.

When Muslims ask; ‘What can I do or not do?’ the Muslim does not turn to the Qur’an, but to the Hadith. What is the Hadith?

Hadith means tradition and it refers to what most Muslims believe to be a record of the words, actions, and the silent approval of the Prophet Muhammad. In other words, the Hadith are reports about what Muhammad said and did.

To the majority of Muslims, the most reliable Hadith is Sahih-al-Bhukari:

Sahih al-Bukhari is a collection of hadith compiled by Imam Muhammad al-Bukhari (d. 256 AH/870 AD). His collection is recognized by the overwhelming majority of the Muslim world to be the most authentic collection of reports of the Sunnah of the Prophet Muhammad. It contains over 7500 hadith (with repetitions) in 97 books.[4]

Just as Mormons cannot have a testimony of the Book of Mormon, without a testimony of the life and teachings of the prophet Joseph Smith, so Muslims cannot say that they have a belief in the Qur’an, whilst refusing to follow the teachings of the prophet Muhammad.

Muslim scholars are in total agreement that if a person refuses to accept the Sunnah (the complete trustworthy rites and teachings) of the Prophet   and obey it as an integral part of the religion (Islam), a revelation from Allah Almighty that is a Divine source of Islam and an explanation of the Quran, and a perfect example for all mankind to follow, then he is an apostate or a disbeliever.

Imam Ibn Hazm   said: “If a person says, ‘I only accept what I find in the Quran’, he becomes a disbeliever according to the consensus of Muslims.”[5]

Thus, Saith the Prophet - Jesus

As we have seen, Mormons and Muslims are similar in that they look to their respective prophets to guide them and lead them to salvation. The teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith and the Prophet Muhammad are to be heeded if a person is to please, and reach, God.

Now both religions acknowledge Jesus as a Prophet, in the sense that they believe Jesus to have been sent by God, but neither group look to Him alone for forgiveness of sin and eternal life.

You can listen here to a Mormon Missionary who found the Jesus he never knew.

In my next article I will consider how these groups view Jesus in the way the see salvation.



[1] https://abn.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/scriptures/dc-testament?lang=eng

[2] Doctrine and Covenants 5:10

[3] The Teachings of Ezra Taft Benson, p.41

[4] https://muhammadan.org/bukhari/

[5] https://www.islamweb.net/en/article/174811/a-muslim-must-accept-and-follow-the-sunnah


 

Comments

Unknown said…
Tony, frankly you are disingenuous.

What does your cult believe in that is unbiblical?

Popular posts from this blog

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

The Dangers of Adding to the Bible: Guest Post by Jacob Lambert

T oday, when we come across Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons we find that they are led by a group of people who hold unquestioned authority. Members of this group know this, some even believe it themselves. This puts them in a powerful position, even to the point where they can create their own Bible. Two examples are the J oseph S mith Translation of the Mormons and the N ew W orld T ranslation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. T hey can add words into their own Bible, words that are not in other, respectable, translations. F or example, in the Greek, C olossians 1:1 6 say s that J esus created all things: ‘ He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities – all things were created through him and for him.’ Col.1:15,16, ESV Jehovah’s Witnesses say that this runs counter to their understanding that Jesus is God’s first creat...

Cheers!

  In their latest update #4, the Jehovah’s Witnesses' Governing Body has announced that toasting and ‘ clinking glasses’  is now allowed at the individual Jehovah’s Witness’s ‘ bible trained conscience’ .  This, Governing Body member Stephen Lett tells us, is due to ‘ prayerful consideration’  by the Governing Body.  This doesn’t sound unreasonable; who could possibly object to toasting, it’s such an innocuous custom?  The answer to that is the Governing Body itself, until now. Ever since 1952, and possibly earlier, the Watchtower has roundly condemned this practice due to its ‘ pagan roots’  in ‘ false religion’ .  The 15 May 1952 Watchtower (page 319), has this to say on the matter Jehovah God and Christ Jesus are not honored by having pagan customs of toasting switched to them, or to human s In 1968, in an answer to  Questions from Readers,  the 1 Jan Watchtower states If a Christian is going to make a request f...