Skip to main content

The Watch Tower 'Crown of Righteousness'

 


For our latest Watch Tower Wednesday on Facebook we were again in the Examining the Scriptures Daily - 2022 where, for January 4, we read:

'The apostle Paul said that all true Christians are in a race. (Heb. 12:1) And all of us, young or old, energetic or tired, must endure to the end if we want to receive the prize that Jehovah offers us. (Matt. 24:13) Paul had freeness of speech because he had successfully “run the race to the finish.” (2 Tim. 4:7), But what, especially, is the race that Paul spoke about? Paul sometimes used features from the games held in ancient Greece to teach important lessons. (1 Cor. 9:25-27; 2 Tim. 2:5) On a number of occasions, he used running as in a footrace to illustrate the Christian course of life. (1 Cor. 9: 24; Gal. 2:2; Phil. 2:16) A person enters this “race” when he dedicates himself to Jehovah and gets baptized. (1 Pet. 3:21) He crosses the finish line when Jehovah grants him the prize of everlasting life.—Matt.25:31-34, 46; 2 Tim. 4:8. w20.04 26 ˚1-3'

When Paul writes about the 'crown of righteousness' what does he mean? Is it 'the prize of everlasting life' as the Watch Tower is teaching here? Jehovah's Witnesses are burdened with the task of earning eternal life.

Note they attribute Hebrews to Paul. Various authors have been suggested for this fine epistle, such as Barnabas, Clement, Luke, Apollos and, of course, Paul. Scholarship going back to the early church fathers has recognised significant differences between Paul’s writing style and method of argument and those of Hebrews. Still, if you are determined to not be informed by the scholarship of ‘Christendom’…

Which brings me to a second point. Looking through these daily homilies I can’t help but notice the continuing use of strange and awkward terminology – ‘Paul had freeness of speech.’ Where did that come from? In an earlier study I came across ‘evangeliser.’ They make word choices for no other reason, it seems, than a determination to not use established Christian terminology.


‘Crown of Righteousness’

Is the ‘crown of righteousness’ the prize of everlasting life given to those who finish the race? This is the familiar faith-and-works conundrum so fought over, particularly by the Reformers.

A key text in 2 Timothy is to, ‘preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke and exhort, with complete patience and teaching.’ (2 Tim.4:2)

The word is the core message of Scripture, the gospel. What was Paul’s gospel?

Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved…’ (Acts 16:31)

All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified by his grace as a gift, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus…’ (Rom.3:23,24)

For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.’ (Rom.6:23)

Paul’s consistent message was that eternal life is a gift and not earned. He begins this letter:

Therefore, do not be ashamed of the testimony of our Lord, nor of me his prisoner, but share in the suffering of the gospel by the power of God, who saved us and called us to a holy calling, not because of our wrks but because of his own purpose and grace, which he gave us in Christ Jesus before the ages began…’ (2 Tim.1:8,9)

It would seem odd, then, that later in the same letter, and after a life devoted to the message of grace, he should write about eternal life as a reward. Paul clarifies what he means, proving consistent with everything he has taught, when he writes:

I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith. Henceforth there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, will award me on that Day, and not only to me but also to all who have loved his appearing.’ (2 Tm.4:7,8)

The crown is not a reward for any meritorious act but an evidence of justification and true faith. It is for those ‘who have loved his appearing.’ The unrighteous cannot love his appearing, rather they dread the coming judgement. They are not prepared for that last day, but the Christian anticipates it with a glad and joyous heart. That believer ‘has eternal life.’ John 5:24

About That Race

If the believer, the one who has ‘loved his appearing,’ has eternal life, then what is the race, the prize? In Acts, Paul writes of, ‘the ministry that I received from the Lord Jesus, to testify to the gospel of the grace of God.’ (Acts 20:24) Having been saved ‘by grace through faith’ Paul’s life exemplifies the faith journey of every true Christian believer.

This is the much misunderstood and misrepresented justification James writes about when he writes of Abraham being justified by works (Js.2:21). It is Christ who is our justification before God. Our works justify us before a watching world. In running the race we demonstrate the authenticity of our faith profession to men and to ourselves (how often have believers doubted their own salvation?)

The race is the process of sanctification, by God’s grace bringing us to completion (Mt.5:48) by the Spirit’s working power fitting us for heaven (1 John 3:2) Only in this way could even Paul express such confidence in what is laid up for him, ‘the crown of righteousness.’

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...