Skip to main content

Mormonism and the Atonement (Part 2)

 


And being in agony he prayed more earnestly; and his sweat became like great drops of blood falling down to the ground.    LUKE 22:44

 

“GREATEST SUFFERING WAS IN GETHSEMANE. We speak of the passion of Jesus Christ. A great many people have an idea that when he was on the cross, and nails were driven into his hands and feet, that was his great suffering. His great suffering was before he ever was placed upon the cross. It was in the Garden of Gethsemane that the blood oozed from the pores of his body: ‘Which suffering caused myself, even God, the greatest of all, to tremble because of pain, and to bleed at every pore, and to suffer both body and spirit-and would that I might not drink the bitter cup, and shrink.’ That was not when he was on the cross; that was in the garden. That is where he bled from every pore in his body”[1]

 

Peculiar to Mormonism is the idea that Jesus atoned for the sins of the world in the Garden of Gethsemane. Though espoused by many Mormon leaders, this is not what the Bible teaches.

Throughout the New Testament it is the death of the Christ that is stressed.

 

Romans 5:10- For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of His Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by His life.”

 

Hebrews 9:22 states that without the shedding (not sweating) of blood, there is no remission of sins.

 

The Apostle Paul, writing to the believers at Corinth said:

Now I would remind you, brothers, of the gospel I preached to you, which you received, in which you stand, and by which you are being saved, if you hold fast to the word I preached to you—unless you believed in vain. For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received: that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures.

1 CORINTHIANS 15:1-4


The Apostle Peter wrote that:

He (Jesus)himself bore our sins” in his body on the cross, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; “by his wounds you have been healed.” (1 Peter 2:24)

According to the Bible, Jesus did not atone for the sin of the world through perspiration (through sweating drops of blood in the Garden of Gethsemane) but through expiration (he died).


THE CROSS

The Garden of Gethsemane is only mentioned by name twice (Matthew 26:36 and Mark 14:32) and it is never spoken of as playing a role in the atonement. Rather, it is the cross that is stressed.

 

Galatians 6:14- “But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world.”

 

Philippians 2:8- “And being found in fashion as a man, He humbled Himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.”


It was on the cross that Jesus was inaugurating the New Covenant and it was in his dying, that he was following the pattern for forgiveness of sin as laid out in the Old Testament. Under the Old Covenant redemption was made through ceremonial sacrifice. Atonement for sin was made via the death of an innocent substitute. This substitute would give its life, to pay the penalty of sin.




[1] (Joseph Fielding Smith. Doctrines of Salvation 1:130.).

 


And the priest shall make atonement for him for the sin which he has committed, and he shall be forgiven.

Leviticus 4:35

 

YOM KIPPUR

Then, once a year the people of Israel celebrated the Day of Atonement, or Yom Kippur. On this day the High Priest would offer sacrifice for Israel as a nation.

For on this day shall atonement be made for you to cleanse you. You shall be clean before the Lord from all your sins.

LEVITICUS 16:30

The sacrifice was a vicarious substitution. The animal (often a lamb) was taking upon itself the penalty due sinful man. This animal sacrifice was a type of Jesus who would one day come and willingly pay the price of sin through His own death on the cross.



This sacrifice of the Lord Jesus fulfilled and surpassed that which was taught under the Old Covenant, a fact spoken of by the writer to the Hebrews:

 

But as it is, the Messiah has obtained a ministry that is as much more excellent than the old as the covenant he mediates is better, since it is enacted on better promises. For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion to look for a second.

HEBREWS 8:6-7

 

But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things that have come, then through the greater and more perfect tent (not made with hands, that is, not of this creation) he entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption. For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God.

Hebrews 9:11-14

 

Discussing whether the atonement took place in the Garden of Gethsemane or on the Cross of Calvary is important. If the Mormons are correct, then Jesus’ death on the cross is of little consequence. Indeed, if true, did He even need to die?

In conversations with Mormons, it is always important to define terms. We can be using the same words, but their understanding is ‘Mormonese’.

We have so far considered where Mormons believe the atonement took place, but what do they understand of the atonement? What did the atonement achieve and how is it applied to their lives? That will be discussed in the next article.  





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...