Skip to main content

THE JESUS OF THEOSOPHY


 

We humans know that we could be much more than we ordinarily are. But what is this? What potential do we have that we could develop more fully? And who could tell us what this potential is? There is a body of knowledge that answers these questions. It provides theory, practice, and techniques that enable us to free ourselves from the limitations of ordinary life and achieve greater happiness, wisdom, and peace.

This knowledge has gone by many names: the Ancient Wisdom, the perennial philosophy, the wisdom tradition. Because it is universally true, it is found all over the world, but it takes many different forms, depending upon the time and circumstances and the people it is addressing.

One version of this Ancient Wisdom in recent times is Theosophy.[1]

 

The name Theosophy derives from two Greek words. Theos meaning ‘god’ and Sophia meaning wisdom, so Theosophy literally means ‘divine wisdom’. It is an eclectic mix of beliefs drawn from philosophy, mysticism, and various religions. It could rightly be said to be a form of ancient Gnosticism.

The founders of this movement were a Russian spiritualist, Helena Blavatsky and two American devotees Henry Steel Olcott and W.Q. Judge. Though seen by many as an occultic fraud, Theosophical adherents believe Blavatsky’s writings to be key to understanding and practicing the religion.

Helena Petrovna was born in Russia in the early 1830s. Whilst in her teens she married a man named N.B. Blavatsky, who was a military general. Within two months she deserted him, spending the next twenty-five years travelling and studying various philosophies. At one point she became a channeler for a spirit-guide who called himself King John. 

Helena Petrovna once described as the ‘immensely fat, often foul-mouthed Madame Blavatsky’[2], founded The Theosophical Society of New York in 1875.  She taught that there is an ancient and secretive brotherhood of spiritual adepts known as the Masters, who—although found across the world—are centred in Tibet.

These Masters are believed to have developed great wisdom and supernatural powers, and Theosophists believe that it was they who initiated the modern Theosophical movement through disseminating their teachings via Blavatsky. They believe that these Masters are attempting to revive knowledge of an ancient religion once found across the world and which will again come to eclipse the existing world religions.[3] 

As we have done with previous articles on the Jesus of the Cults, we will consider what Theosophy’s response might be to Jesus’ question: Who do you say that I am? Here is a brief outline of what this group believes.

God

Like other Gnostic and Mind Science groups, Theosophy has a pantheistic view of God, speaking of Him in impersonal terms. This means they would not use the pronoun ‘Him’, as I have just done, neither are they keen to use the term 'God':

“Theosophy objects to the masculine pronoun used in connection with the Self-existent Cause, or Deity. It says IT – inasmuch as that “cause” the rootless root of all – is neither male, female, nor anything to which an attribute – something always conditioned, finite, and limited – can be applied.”[4]

“…the term “God” is generally rejected in Theosophy – as is any notion of an anthropomorphic, personal, or semi-personal God – but that the Divine Itself is never denied but insistently and emphatically affirmed to be the One and Only Reality, the One Life everywhere and in everything, and the True Self of each and all.”[5]

In Theosophy God is not personal, but rather an unknowable principle.

Jesus

Theosophy denies the deity, and unique position as Saviour, of Jesus Christ:

“Most readers will probably agree that a world teacher known as the Christ did come, and that he founded a religion 2,000 years ago. Why do they think so? They reply that God so loved the world that he sent his son the Christ to bring it light and life. If that is true, how can we avoid the conclusion that he or his predecessors, must have come many times before. The belief that he came but once is consistent only with the erroneous notion that Genesis is history, instead of allegory…when a new era in human evolution begins, a world teacher comes in a voluntary incarnation and founds a new religion that is suited to the requirements of a new age.”[6]

This quote shows that Theosophy is religiously pluralistic and syncretistic. They teach that Jesus is only one of many incarnations demonstrating the God-principle. In fact, they go even further by maintaining that the Jesus of mainstream Christianity never even existed. Madame Blavatsky said:

“Jesus Christ, i.e., the Man-God of the Christians, copied from the Avatars of every country, from the Hindu Krishna as well as the Egyptian Horus, was never a historical person. He is a deified personification of the glorified type of the great Hierophants of the Temples, and his story, as told in the New Testament, is an allegory, assuredly containing profound esoteric truths, but still an allegory.”[7]

Blavatsky taught that Jesus was a philosopher and a moral reformer, a great teacher with the ability to heal and exorcise demons.[8]

Gnostic cults are fond of separating Jesus and the Christ, teaching that Jesus is only a man and the Christ to be the divine consciousness within him. Theosophy believes that every human has, to a greater or lesser degree, this divine consciousness, sometimes referred to as a divine spark, and so teach that all are ‘Christs’. This is not what the Bible teaches. There we find that Jesus is uniquely the Christ, the Messiah whose coming was prophesied in the Old Testament.

Salvation

Theosophy denies the Biblical teaching of original sin and therefore teaches that there is no need for salvation. Blavatsky denied that it is appointed for a man once to die and after that judgement:[9]

"We believe in no hell or paradise as localities; in no objective hell-fires and worms that never die, nor in any Jerusalems with streets paved with sapphires and diamonds."[10]

She rather she taught the Hindu belief in karma and reincarnation. Therefore, within the theology of Theosophy there is no need for Christ’s substitutionary sacrifice for all sin.[11]

Theosophy is more akin to the New Age Movement and not in any way compatible with Christianity. The Jesus of Theosophy is not unique, not a Saviour, not the Christ of Scripture. Therefore, Theosophy’s Jesus is false and cannot save.


[1] https://www.theosophical.org/about/theosophy

[2] Quoted in Strange Gospels – Ruth Tucker (Marshall Pickering, 1991) p.322

[3] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theosophy

[4]  (Helena Blavatsky, “Theosophical Articles and Notes” p. 196-197)

[5] https://blavatskytheosophy.com/what-does-theosophy-say-about-god/

[6] Rogers, L.W.  – Elementary Theosophy.  6th Edition. The Theosophical Press, 1956

[7] “Theosophy: Some Rare Perspectives” p. 83-85

[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_and_Theosophy#God

[9] Hebrews 9:27

[10] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_and_Theosophy#CITEREFBlavatsky1889

[11] 1 John 2:2

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent

The Mormon God’s Dysfunctional Family

You know those moments when you look at something you’ve looked at a thousand times before and suddenly see something new? I was looking at a blog I found via the Google Blog Alerts service and it told the familiar story of the Mormon “ Plan of Salvation”; you can read it here. There really was nothing surprising until I started thinking about what people might think if a family they knew conducted themselves the way the Mormon “family of God” do in this story. People from abusive backgrounds have problems enough with the idea of God as a Father but this story would put anyone off the idea forever! As I recount this story think about what the typical dad would do as his kids are growing up and compare it with this “exalted man.” According to Mormonism “ God created our spirits” and we lived with him in a pre-mortal existence (Mormons say “pre-existence” but it is not possible to pre-exist, i.e. to exist before you exist. The noun “existence” has to be have the prefix “pre” othe