Skip to main content

Tyndale 1, Mormon Prophets 0

Image
By
scriptures-eye-glasses-758818-galleryThe official Bible of the Mormon Church is the Authorised Version or, as it is known in America, the King James Bible, or Version (KJV). Its not so much that Mormons are 'King James Only' exponents, as that this was the Bible in whose style Joseph Smith wrote the Book of Mormon. This being the case, it is the continued use of the KJV that lends some authenticity to the Book of Mormon, the latter sounding like the Mormon Tripleformer and, therefore, seeming a continuation of it.

Put the Book of Mormon next to a modern translation, even one as conservative as the New American Standard, and Smith's magnus opus loses something of its gloss. See for yourself.

Here is a familiar text from Matthew's gospel as it appears in the Book of Mormon (yes, God himself was plagiarised by Smith):


'Ask, and it shall be given unto you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it will be opened unto you. For everyone that asketh, receiveth; and he that seeketh, findeth; and to him that knocketh, it shall be opened.

 Or what man is there of you, who, if his son ask bread (sic), will give him a stone? Or if he ask a fish, will he give him a serpent?

 If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your Father, who is in heaven give good things to them that ask him?'

Here it is in the NASB:

 'Ask, and it shall be given to you; seek, and you shall find; knock, and it shall be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks find, and to him who knocks it shall be opened.
Or what man is there among you, when his son shall ask him for a loaf, will give him a stone?
Or if he shall ask for a fish, he will not give him a snake, will he?

 If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more shall your Father who is in heaven give what is good to those who ask Him!'

What would the Good News Book of Mormon look like?

 'Ask, and you will receive; seek, and you will find; knock, and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks will receive, and anyone who seeks will find, and the door will be opened to those who knock.

Would any of you who are fathers give your son a stone when he asks for bread?
Or would you give him a snake when he asks for a fish?

As bad as you are, you know how to give good things to your children. How much more, then, will your Father in heaven give good things to those who ask him!'

Even Joseph Smith's own 'translation,' the 'Inspired Version,' reads like the KJV. Which brings me to Tyndale's magnificent win over Mormon prophets (and over Jerome for that matter).

Jerome and the Vulgate


Jerome (5th century) was the man who, if you remember, wrote the Vulgate translation of the Bible, Vulgate from the Latin for common, or popular (for 'common' read, priests understood it). Jerome had a problem when he came to translating 1 Corinthians 1,13, the famous passages about love that we hear read at weddings.

The Greek word is agape which means not carnal, or romantic love, but God's quality of love, the quality of love between Christians, love for neighbour (not strictly appropriate for weddings but lets not strain at a gnat and spoil a nice day).

The problem facing Jerome was the Latin word for love, amor, which is exactly carnal, romantic love. This was too gross for Jerome so he changed it for the Latin caritas, which got turned into charity. This had the unintended but much appreciated consequence of giving the church a ready supply of money. The church derived its income from charity and, since 'the greatest of these is charity,' the future looked bright, the future looked purple

Tyndale


Tyndale worked from the Greek to make an English translation so he didn't face the problem facing Jerome. Tyndale's version of the same passage reads, 'Though I speake with the tonges of men and angels and yet have no love I were ever as sounding brasse: or a tynklynge Cymball...Nowe abideth fayth, hope and lover, even these three: but the chefe of these is love'

To make the Book of Mormon appear authentic to the untrained eye the Mormon Church sticks doggedly to the KJV. The KJV brings across that word charity from Jerome. This demonstrates, in turn that, notwithstanding having prophets and apostles, the Mormon Church mistranslates love – agape – every time it appears in the New Testament. Even Joseph Smith's 'Inspired Version' (JST) of the Bible gives us 'charity' where Paul clearly gives us 'love.'

In an article in the April 2015 Ensign magazine of the Mormon Church Boy K Packer of the Quorum of the Twelve quotes a text in support of a point he makes:

 'Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, in charity, in spirit, in faith, in purity.' (1 Timothy 4:12)

The word 'charity' translates the Greek agape, love.

This is not an apologetic for modern versions of the Bible, although I am personally a great fan of better scholarship based on more and better sources. It is a call for closer scrutiny of claims made by cults to be the only mouthpiece for God on earth. When God says agape he means love. When Jerome struggles for the Latin equivalent, that is one thing, when men claim to alone speak for God and still say 'charity' that is a completely different affair.

Oh, did I mention how rich the Mormon Church is?

This originally appeared in the April Reachout E-newsletter. You can subscribe here and never miss an issue
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

By
In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

By
The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...
70 comments
Read more

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

By
The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...
18 comments
Read more