Skip to main content

QUOTE...MISQUOTE

If there is one aspect of the Watchtower Society that clearly shows their deception it is the way they quote or rather misquote many authorities. They make quotations that deny the very things they believe, support them through judicial editing. This is despite there own advice to others.

“Be very careful to be accurate in all statements you make. Use evidence
honestly. In quotations do not twist the meaning of a writer or speaker or use
only partial quotations to give a different thought than the person intended…” - Qualified to be Ministers, WB&TS, 1967, p.199.

We have published a number of examples before in books such as Awake! to the Watchtower but we provide a new selection here.

The first quotations come from the Society's publication Reasoning from the Scriptures and are found under the heading of ‘Neutrality’, pp.272-275. It will be noticed from the first quotation that the Watchtower are so determined to prove the point of neutrality they even use a quote from someone who believes that parts of the Acts of the Apostles is fantasy. The parts that the Society have omitted are in BOLD CAPITALS.

“A careful review of all the information available goes to show that until the time of Marcus Aurelis, no Christian became a soldier; and no soldier after becoming a Christian, remained in military service. AGAINST THIS CONCLUSION IT CAN BE ARGUED THAT, ACCORDING TO ACTS (X 1-48), CORNELIUS, A CENTURION OF THE ITALIAN BAND, WAS BAPTISED, TOGETHER WITH OTHERS... THAT ACCORDING TO ACTS (XII 12), SERGIUS PAULUS, THE PROCONSUL OF CYPRUS, ‘BELIEVED’... AND FINALLY THAT THE JAILER AT PHILIPPI (ACTS XVI 23-34) WAS BAPTISED... STORIES IN WHICH SUCH MIRACULOUS EMBELLISHMENTS OCCUR CANNOT BE REGARDED AS SOBER HISTORY: WE HAVE IN FACT, SEEN REASON TO HOLD THAT, IN THE FIRST PART OF ACTS, FACT AND FANTASY ARE BLENDED SO AS TO MAKE A RECORD WHICH IS SOMETIMES ALLEGORY AND SOMETIMES LITERAL TRUTH.” - The Rise of Christianity, E.W.Barnes, 1947, p.333.
“The Christians stood aloof and distinct from the state, as a priestly and spiritual race, and Christianity seemed able to influence civil life only in that manner which, it must be confessed, is the purest, by practically endeavouring to instil more and more feeling into the citizens of the state... THOSE ON THE CONTRARY, WHO DETERMINED THAT IT WAS ALLOWABLE FOR A CHRISTIAN TO ACCEPT CIVIL AND MILITARY OFFICES... WHEN THEY APPEALED TO THE CASE OF THE CENTURION, WHOSE FAITH CHRIST HIMSELF HAD PRAISED (LUKE VII) AND OF THE BELIEVING CORNELIUS... EVEN TERTULLIAN HIMSELF, THE WARM OPPONENT OF ARMS AMONG CHRISTIANS, DID NOT FEEL HIMSELF AUTHORISED ALTOGETHER TO CONDEMN THOSE WHO, HAVING BECOME CHRISTIANS WHILE THEY WERE SOLDIERS, CONTINUED IN THEIR OLD PROFESSION, PROVIDED IT WAS UNATTENDED WITH ANY THING WHICH CAUSED THEM TO VIOLATE THEIR FIDELITY AS CHRISTIANS.” - History of the Christian Religion and Church During the First Three Centuries, Augustus Neander, 1848, p.168.
BANNERS, STANDARDS AND ENSIGNS ARE FREQUENTLY MENTIONED IN THE BIBLE. ‘EVERY MAN OF THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL SHALL PITCH BY HIS STANDARD, WITH THE ENSIGN OF THEIR FATHER’S HOUSE.’ (NUM 2:2)... Early flags were almost purely of a religious character... The national banner of England for centuries - the red cross of St George - was a religious one; in fact the aid of religion seems ever to have been sought to give sanctity to national flags, and the origin can be traced to a sacred banner.” - Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1949, Vol.9, p.343.

The following quotes are taken from Reasoning from the Scriptures, pages 69-70 and 179-182 dealing with various festivals.

“The later Hebrews looked on the celebration of birthdays as part of idolatrous worship, a view which would be abundantly confirmed by what they saw of the common observances associated with those days. YET THE LANGUAGE OF JEREMIAH, TAKEN IN CONNECTION WITH THAT OF JOB, DOES FURNISH SOME GROUND FOR THINKING THAT BIRTHDAYS IN GENERAL WERE JOYFULLY REMEMBERED, JOB 3:3 &C; JER 20:14 &C.” - The Imperial Bible Dictionary, P.Fairburn, 1874, Vo1. 1, p.225.

“The reason for establishing December 25 as Christmas is somewhat obscure, but it is usually held that the day was chosen to correspond to pagan festivals that took place around the time of the winter solstice, when the days began to lengthen, to celebrate the ‘rebirth of the sun’... The Roman Saturnalia (a festival dedicated to Saturn, the god of agriculture, and to the renewed power of the sun) also took place at this time, and some Christian customs are thought to be rooted in this ancient pagan celebration... IT IS HELD BY SOME SCHOLARS THAT THE BIRTH OF CHRIST AS ‘LIGHT OF THE WORLD’ WAS MADE ANALOGOUS TO THE REBIRTH OF THE SUN IN ORDER TO MAKE CHRISTIANITY MEANINGFUL TO PAGAN CONVERTS... BUT ALMOST FROM THE FIRST, CHRISTIANS HAVE GENERALLY REGARDED CHRISTMAS AS BOTH A HOLY DAY AND A HOLIDAY. FOR CHRIST’S BIRTH BROUGHT A NEW SPIRIT OF JOY INTO THE WORLD…” - Encyclopaedia Americana, 1977, Vol. VI, p.666.

“There is no indication of the observance of the Easter festival in the New Testament, or in the writings of the apostolic Fathers. The sanctity of special times was an idea absent from the minds of the first Christians... THE FIRST CHRISTIANS CONTINUED TO OBSERVE THE JEWISH FESTIVALS, THOUGH IN A NEW SPIRIT, AS COMMEMORATION OF EVENTS WHICH THOSE FESTIVALS HAD FORESHADOWED. THUS THE PASSOVER WITH A NEW CONCEPTION ADDED TO IT OF CHRIST AS THE TRUE PASCHAL LAMB AND THE FIRST FRUITS FROM THE DEAD, CONTINUED TO BE OBSERVED, AND BECAME THE CHRISTIAN EASTER. ALTHOUGH THE OBSERVANCE OF EASTER WAS AT A VERY EARLY PERIOD THE PRACTICE OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH…” - Encyclopaedia Britannica, 1910, Vol. 8, p.828.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obama's mother posthumously baptized into LDS Church - Salt Lake Tribune

In the wake of his remarkable success it seemed that the world and his wife wanted to claim President Obama as their own with even an Irish connection being dug up. Now the Mormons have got in on the act by posthumously baptising his mother. They have in the past upset the Jewish community, the Catholic Church and now the American President with this wacky and unbiblical practice but there is no indication that they will review it. And, of course, it is always someone else’s fault and they promise a thorough inquiry to uncover the real culprits. Maybe they should try looking in the mirror. President Barack Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, who died in 1995, was baptized posthumously into The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints last year during her son's campaign, according to Salt Lake City-based researcher Helen Radkey. The ritual, known as “baptism for the dead,” was done June 4 in the Provo temple, and another LDS temple rite, known as the “endowment,” was...

Mormon Christians? Whats in a Name?

The Mormon Church, disturbed by the continuing identifying of polygamus sects in the news with the name Mormon, recently issued a press statement aimed at "clarifying" issues. It is interesting to note that if you substitute the name "Christian" where they use the name "Mormon" it makes a very good argument for us against the claims of the Mormon Church. The full press release is reproduced below in italics with each paragraph rewritten in ordinary text to present it from a Christian perspective. SALT LAKE CITY 10 July 2008 On 26 June, Newsroom published a package of information featuring profiles of ordinary Latter-day Saints in Texas. With no other intention but to define themselves, these members provided a tangible depiction of what their faith is all about. They serve as the best distinction between the lifestyles and values of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and a Texas-based polygamous group that has recently attracted media attent...

Is atheism an intolerant belief?

The Big Questions , Sunday 2 August 2009, third question. A growing number of Britons say they are certain there is no God - but how do they know? Professor John Adams of the North Yorkshire Humanist Association begins by asking theists what evidence they have for their beliefs. Paul Woolley of Theos continues by pointing out Richard Dawkins description of faith as a 'virus', and the appalling track record of atheism in the 20th Century, as spearheaded by Pol Pot and Stalin. Chloe Clifford-Frith of the Humanist and Secular Students Society contends that Stalin did not do the things he did because he was an atheist, but because he was evil. Paul Woolley rejoins that atheists are trying to have it both ways when they claim that religion is the cause of evil, but refuse to acknowledge the ideological impetus of atheism when it comes to many evil acts. Mao and Stalin both replaced God with the State - a 'religious' manoeuvre. Rev Alistair Rycroft of St Michael Le Belfrey Ch...